Prince Charles explains 'pebble theatre'.
|
PEBBLE
|
Don Pierson [right] explains how a young Prince Charles made a request to join the Radio London fan club. |
|
Prince Charles explains 'pebble theatre'.
|
PEBBLE
|
Don Pierson [right] explains how a young Prince Charles made a request to join the Radio London fan club. |
|
Beginning tomorrow we will separate our two Blogs by continuing to unmask the fictitious story of Radio Caroline on our companion Blog - see the link button above, and filling-in as many of the blank spots in the real timeline that we have already uncovered (and still uncovering), about the true story of Radio Caroline, on this Blog.
According to Paul Rusling in his 'bible', the Fetter Lane address came before the Regent Street address, and he bases this on another statement in which he claims that Ian Cowper Ross had and an office on Fetter Lane at Queen' magazine from where Radio Caroline was managed.
But then, according to Rusling, after "a month or so .... Jocelyn Stevens soon tired of the venture ...." and that he became "concerned that when a writ arrived from the music copyright agents it was to his office." Then writes Rusling: "A temporary mailing address in Regent Street was used, with just a secretary and the sales staff based there until Oonagh found a lovely seven story townhouse in Chesterfield Gardens ...." Rusling then adds that: "On the upper floors were more offices, which Oonagh would let out to friends in the burgeoning music industry." There is no mention of who owned the building, or how Dick Morecraft came to be employed by Harry Meadows. Also notice the vagueness in Rusling's account. There are no dates. There is just a general storyline that is recited as if it is fact that Fetter Lane came first, and then came Regent Street. But that is not true at all. First came Regent Street and then came Fetter Lane. Jocelyn Stevens never did get "tired of the venture". All of this we can, and we will prove as fact. So it seems that if we want to know more about the Rusling version of the time sequence, then we have to know more about Oonagh, and according to Rusling, her last name is "Huggard". Tomorrow we will address those questions about her identity, and the dates in question. It was late evening on Friday, March 27, 1964, when avant-garde transmissions suddenly appeared on radio sets located in south-eastern England, and on corresponding coastline areas of other European countries.
Those first test transmissions consisted of hodge-podge mixture of sound, and the next day the same formula was introduced as regular programming. They began with a British cover version of Buddy Holly's American song "Not Fade Away". That song was in this instance, more a statement of a hope than a statement of fact, because the reason why the mv Fredericia (renamed 'Caroline') from where those broadcasts originated, had dropped anchor within earshot of London and its Crown civil servants, was to prod the men with power into a reaction: Would 'Caroline' be allowed to stay, or would it be forced to go? As if by magic, a mailing address at 54-62 Regent Street had also appeared within the delivery route of a Royal Mail postman, and requests for reception reports from listeners began to be incorporated within the station's daytime-only regular transmissions. They were targeting defenseless English housewives with a strange sort of programming, best described as an all-day version of the BBC Light Programme radio show called "Housewives' Choice'. It wasn't brash at all. It was very laid back and seductively friendly in a formal sort of way that would not disturb the daily chores of Mrs England as she vacuumed her floors or hand-washed her family's breakfast dishes. By the time her husband got home it was time to turn off the Radio Caroline transmitter for the day. As for children returning from school in mid-afternoon, they could hear Frank Sinatra, or the Rolling Stones, or some theme from a cinema film, but nothing to really excite them. It was the BBC from a boat. But what was Radio Caroline? Who was behind it? While a few 'serious' publications began to delve into answering that question, most of the daily press concentrated upon the more political aspects of the story. The British airwaves were the property of the British Crown, and 'Radio Caroline' was affront to all that was 'British' with its approach to law and order. This was not America where crassness ruled the day. All of those American products that filled all of those British homes had been disguised as British 'cover versions' to make the 'Wild West' crudeness of those 'Yanks' disappear from view. Instead of being 'American' all of those products were seen as being 'British'. Yet in reality, the world of the British housewife revolved around American products, only she did not think of them that way. This was early 1964, and the Pilkington Committee had already pronounced a curse on all of those American television program imports that flooded ITA franchised areas with 'Cowboys and Indians' and 'Cops and Robbers'. Housewives should be spared from this sort of audio abuse while they tended to their "little ones" or scrubbed their floors at home. So the question of who was behind Radio Caroline went unquestioned once a public relations firm told the popular press that it was an Irishman in his early twenties. He had a rich father and somehow this Irishman had teamed-up with out-of-work English actors to create a daytime commercial radio station broadcasting from a boat. Well, that explained it all. The Irish with few exceptions, were really on a par with those "colored people' who had begun to arrive in England. They were just not civilized in the way that the English were. The Scots were those people in a northern area adjoining English counties, so they were not civilized either. Harry Secombe "got away with" on behalf of those coal mining male singers in Wales because he could sing properly, and besides which, he was friends with Peter Sellers, and Peter Sellers was a pal of Princess Margaret and her 'Set' of "upper-crust" friends who all loved the BBC 'Goon Show'. But who were the people at 54-62 Regent Street? No one seemed too concerned at the time because for awhile, the issue was not of concern. Someone there was receiving the letters delivered by the Royal Mail, and that was all there was to it, or so it seemed. But behind the scenes, the British Crown was taking stock and beginning to investigate, and it seems that the blanket of obscurity would not last for long before a hurricane wind of wrath descended upon the person or persons receiving those letters at 54-62 Regent Street. They would be brought to account. Answers would be demanded. There were many different offices located at 54-62 Regent Street, and those businesses were spread over many floors at that same address. (See our companion Blog All About Caroline, for examples.) Yet this unanswered question about 54-62 Regent Street is the primary question that should have been asked and answered, because it was the key to answering the questions: "who bought a ship; anchored it off Harwich, England and had begun broadcasting in defiance of the wishes of the British Crown?" So that is the question will be focusing upon: How did a business with the name 'Radio Caroline', suddenly crop-up out-of-the-blue at 54-62 Regent Street? |
Our team produced this free radio program for PCRL in Birmingham.
It was repeatedly broadcast on and after October 20, 1985. Click & listen! Blog Archive
August 2023
Copyright 2021 with all rights reserved.
|
Index |
Library |
|