E+O3X Media Microscope
  • YESTERNOIR BLOG
  • YesterCode
    • CHRONO-FRAG
    • GEO-FRAG
    • BIO-FRAG
  • YESTERLINKS
    • Mission Statement
    • WHO WE ARE
    • Conversation Central
    • Email Address
  • YESTERDAY NEVER HAPPENED
    • Ray Clark Interview - 2
    • ARCHIVED BLOG - 1
    • Introductions
  • YESTERSTUDIES
  • YESTERNOIR BLOG
  • YesterCode
    • CHRONO-FRAG
    • GEO-FRAG
    • BIO-FRAG
  • YESTERLINKS
    • Mission Statement
    • WHO WE ARE
    • Conversation Central
    • Email Address
  • YESTERDAY NEVER HAPPENED
    • Ray Clark Interview - 2
    • ARCHIVED BLOG - 1
    • Introductions
  • YESTERSTUDIES
  Prince Charles explains 'pebble theatre'.

PEBBLE



​THEATRE

 ​
​Don Pierson [right]
explains how  a young
Prince Charles made a
request to join the
Radio London fan club.
[CLICK] A COLD CASE INVESTIGATION INTO PAST EVENTS BY YESTERVERSITY
YESTERSTORIES
COMMENTS
CONVERSATION

Rusling jumps and then ....

12/21/2021

 
Posted by Paul Rusling on December 20, 2021, 11:53 pm: "Yesterday we contacted those on our list who bought the Caroline Bible and offered them the latest updated text, free. Some buyers though are unknown to us and we have no contact details. I am making the same offer to others who email me and show you bought a copy. "

Then one day later on 
December 21, 2021, at 12:36 pm, he posted this: "
Just to be clear, what is on offer to previous buyers is a PDF copy of the text that has been updated, i.e. it's a compendium of the pages that have changes on them."

So, after we announced that Mike Wilson would be undertaking a review of this book, Rusling tried to pre-empt our receipt of the book to allow a review to go ahead.

But then the penny dropped and Rusling realized that he would be giving the book away free of charge, because the anoraks are pirates and it would only take one pdf to get into circulation before it found its way on the Internet to be shared by everyone free of charge.

Rusling has now substantially modified his offer to what amounts to an addendum of notes, rather that his book manuscript.

Never-the-less, once we receive his book (if we ever do), the game will be over for Rusling because we will expose his entire textual fraud - free of charge to anyone who wants to read it.

Read our companion Blog for more details.

While we are waiting for Rusling's book ....

12/20/2021

 
We made a short video that explains when Ronan O'Rahilly arrived in London, and how he morphed from a Roman Catholic into an anarchist from which point in time he seems to have lost not only his mind, but taken Paul Rusling on a joy ride into insanity as well. Check it out on our companion Blog using the link above.

Still waiting to find out ....

12/19/2021

 
We have not yet received Rusling's book, and by the looks of it, neither has anyone else, so far! 

Rusling does seem to have sent our bookseller something, and this is the same bookseller that we bought his first edition from. So did Rusling stick a little yellow sticker on his original book in an effort to palm it off as a new book? The publishing date on the inside will tell us if he did.

He says he sold out of hardbacks that he printed for his 'updated' edition, but since we paid for a hardback, will he try to palm us off with a softback that he just paid a printer to churn out in order to shut us up?

Right now we are still waiting to find out the answers to those and many other questions such as: Did Rusling remove obviously false information from his updated book - which did appear in his original book? Did Rusling remove the hypothesis we used about the transfer of CE transmitters from Galveston to Rotterdam? Did he at least try to discover what we now know about Ian Cowper Ross and that supposed joyride to Hindhead with Ronan O'Rahilly?

Hopefully we are only hours away from being told that the Rusling book is waiting in store for us to go and pick it up. We will skim read it and then pass it on to Mike Wilson for a thorough independent review, because Mike is his own man and he will tell it like it is!

While we wait in anticipation ....

12/18/2021

 
The official word is that our order placed 52 days ago, is now on its way. Hopefully, in a day or so we will be told to go and pick-up a hardbound copy of Rusling's second edition.

His first edition revealed that Rusling had no idea about the real story of Radio Caroline, which is why we are waiting to see what else he might stolen before revealing anything more on our Blogs. It is now becoming very clear that in 1964, Radio Caroline was created as a toy for wealthy aristocrats and as a testing device for their related business interests.

If you want a parallel, just think of the sex crime cases being revealed in courts of law today where young girls were used and abused to satisfy the interests of older men with aristocratic titles.

Those aristocrats would slam the door in the face of a Paul Rusling and his ilk, because he does not belong in their circle of wealth and entitlement. Moral values, well that is another matter. But Rusling is fawning all over people who lived in a different wealth strata to the one that he is familiar with, and even with money, he would not be welcome because Rusling is not a part of the aristocracy.

Rusling's absurd stories don't begin to resemble the true story. It is as our 'banner' above proclaims, a story about: "The geopolitics of mass-media manipulation."

It was that same fake story that is now being spun by Rusling, which was also fed to Don Pierson, and that left him wondering why his own experiences in the United Kingdom during the so-called 'Swinging Sixties' had left him high and dry. He wondered what had gone wrong, and as his friends, we set out to find the real answers. Now we are beginning to know what those answers are, and so will you in the coming weeks and months ahead!

News today, Rusling may be ....

12/17/2021

 
We the Trio just got word, Rusling may have just delivered to the bookstore warehouse. What he may have just delivered we don't know. But today we went to our Online account at the bookstore and noticed that something is being shipped our way, as of December 17 for an order placed in October. The store could not deliver it then or weeks later, because Rusling failed to deliver. If it is his updated hard copy, we will let you know, if and when we receive it. Then we can discover what he stole this time, in addition to last time.

The anorak straw man argument ....

12/16/2021

 
A 'straw man argument' is defined as "an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument." and as ".... a fallacious argument that distorts an opposing stance in order to make it easier to attack."

​When applied to Garry Stevens and his small tribe it reads like this:


Posted by Chris Edwards on December 15, 2021, 8:15 pm, in reply to "Re: Radio Caroline Bible  ....Assume you'd read MH pages. I would add I've had nothing to do with him for several years. Originally believed he was writing a book, and shared some Public record documents with him (also shared same with Ray Clark and Paul Rusling) that he accuses others of "stealing" from him.All I can say is that at least Ray and Paul have written books. If MH does   publish a book, then we will judge it for ourselves."
The person claiming to be Chris Edwards begins by stating as fact, something that is totally untrue. It is a lie. But once the premise of that lie is accepted as truth, and then their false arguments begin!

We have explained this process many, many times before by using the humor of Steve Martin:
The misdirection in the anorak instance begins with " ....Assume you'd read MH pages."

You can assume all you like, but first direct us to those "MH pages."

Where are they?

Their next misdirection is in this statement: "​
Originally believed he was writing a book .... at least Ray (Clark) and Paul (Rusling) have written books. If MH does ever publish a book, then we will judge it for ourselves."

So the attack line is based upon the premise that "MH" is writing a book, and that Ray Clark and Paul Rusling have written books, but "MH" has yet to write a book which the writer of this misdirection says that the anoraks will judge for themselves.

However, the original link to the anorak post was by reference to our companion Blog which is not by "MH". It relates to the work of a 'Trio' whose writings have been published since the Nineteen Sixties in newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and in books. It has also been broadcast by both radio and television stations.

By constantly redefining their target of attack, these anoraks never have to address the fatal flaw in their entire belief system, and that is this: Ian Cowper Ross wrote a work of fiction.

If the mythology of Ian Cowper Ross is removed from your storyline, how do you explain the start-up in 1964 of Radio Caroline?

Your silence is deafening.

Rusling: What do you mean by "theft"?

12/15/2021

 
Picture
Paul Rusling on December 13, 2021, 5:05 pm: "I did want to assure you that we have NEVER taken anyone's money and not come up with the goods."

But Pinky forgot to remind Rusling to add this: "Mind you, I did want to assure you that we have ALWAYS taken anyone's work product and not come up with the money, especially when their work product was not being offered for sale."​

Rusling: "I'm not a crook ...."

12/14/2021

 
Paul Rusling on December 13, 2021, 5:05 pm: "Not sure how much you guys believe the twaddle expounded elsewhere but I did want to assure you that we have NEVER taken anyone's money and not come up with the goods. Both my record and my conscience are clear. There's been no fraud here (and no theft either!)." - Yeh, right.

Offshore Echos No.26 just arrived ....

12/13/2021

 

Rather than repeat the same text here, please read our companion Blog for today.

Three stories about yesterday ....

12/12/2021

 
Our own research is rooted in academic studies using the investigative tools often employed by police to solve 'cold case' crimes.

Then there is an interloper named Paul Rusling who stole some of our research; slapped his own name on it, and then twisted it to support an fictitious narrative in aid of Malcolm Smith and an eponymous tiny operation called 'Caroline'.

But now, a third storyline has come to our attention.

This one seems to have begun in earnest somewhere around 2014, which is when we ran into a conundrum involving a book about Charles Orr Stanley and his son named John. Both were involved in building the Pye Group of companies, and from 1959 onwards they led a new fight to obtain radio broadcasting licenses as alternatives to the British Broadcasting Corporation.

Our own research into the history of British broadcasting had taken us back in time to the work of U.S. Justice Hugo L. Black. His interests and our interests came together over his investigation into the origins of the United States Constitution. In the United Kingdom, which does not have a foundational document called a written constitution, Black traced the U.S. written constitution back to a fight for individualism that was led by John Lilburne. This relative of Thomas Jefferson lived from 1615 to 1657.

Now another storyline has come to our attention. This one does not incorporate the work of Black and John Lilburne. Instead, while it does include a somewhat similar evidence base to the one we uncovered,  this other version projects into the future, whereas our own research only deals with the present moment in time.

However, this other line is the work of a very close relative to a member of our own team; published over 50 books, and acquired an impressive accreditation. His futuristic world is based upon the idea of Prince Charles emerging as King Charles III to become not only a British monarch, but a leading figure in a modified United Nations which has morphed into a Federal World Government.

While his idea of federalism is modeled upon the United States system which combines both Federal and State governments, it lacks an existing foundation in law that can be referred to as a written constitution. To overcome this problem he has written and had published documents which create a transition from the present United Nations Organization, into a United Federation of the World.

But whereas U.S, Supreme Court Justice Hugo L. Black could trace the origins of the United States Constitution back in time to the era of John Lilburne and his fight with both King Charles I and Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell, in this instance we would be looking at present-day Russia; China; Iran and other despotic nations becoming sovereign states in a Federal government.

We do not want any part of that.

​We oppose even the present-day monarchical system that governs the United Kingdom, and we certainly do want to legitimize the idea that Prince Charles could become King Charles III who could reign over a United Kingdom, when the present-day U.K. already lacks a continuity of legitimacy. Where the problem for us occurs, is not so much what this third and futuristic storyline says about yesterday, because to some extent we are in agreement with many of its findings. Where we differ is in the future interpretation of that data.

Whereas Rusling stole research from us to create a twisted and fake storyline in support of a bogus link to a tiny eponymous radio station called 'Caroline', this other line tries to lay the groundwork for a tomorrow that is in sharp contrast to the ideas of John Lilburne. It is therefore on a collision course with the development of constitutional law in the United States of America. That path is centered upon individualism. This other idea is centered around collectivism and a 'democratic' vote to be exercised by existing dictatorships and quasi-dictatorships.

We don't want any part of that.

Therefore, now that this third interpretation has popped-up and come to our attention, we have to deal with it because its author is directly related to one of our 'Trio'. How we should deal with this situation has now created a conundrum that we have to address. That is what we are currently working on.
<<Previous
Forward>>
    Picture
    Our team produced this free radio program for PCRL in Birmingham.
    ​It was repeatedly broadcast on and after October 20, 1985.
    Click & listen!
    ​
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Blog Archive

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020

    Copyright 2021 with all rights reserved.

Index

Blog
Who We Are

Library

Academic Archives
​Audio Archives

Contact

Get in touch
Comments
© COPYRIGHT  2021 - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.