Prince Charles explains 'pebble theatre'.
|
PEBBLE
|
Don Pierson [right] explains how a young Prince Charles made a request to join the Radio London fan club. |
|
Prince Charles explains 'pebble theatre'.
|
PEBBLE
|
Don Pierson [right] explains how a young Prince Charles made a request to join the Radio London fan club. |
|
This is an update of the Precursory Chapter Index. It may differ from the final version in print and it will continually expand as more precursory chapters are added.
Chapter One - What was so "special" about Radio Caroline 1964-1967? .... Chapter Two - The inside untold contextual story of the 'Trio' .... Chapter Three - The letter .... Chapter Four - Applying and explaining the 'YesterCode' .... Chapter Five- How this investigation began .... Chapter Six - Jigsaw puzzle fragments and garment threads .... Chapter Seven - In search of the real story .... Chapter Eight - In search of answers .... Chapter Nine - On the side where the moonbeams play .... Chapter Ten - Backseat negotiations .... Chapter Eleven - Who is "Mister Big"? .... Chapter Twelve Origins of 'The Trio' .... This is an update of the Precursory Chapter Index. It may differ from the final version in print and it will continually expand as more precursory chapters are added.
Chapter One - What was so "special" about Radio Caroline 1964-1967? .... Chapter Two - The inside untold contextual story of the 'Trio' .... Chapter Three - The letter .... Chapter Four - Applying and explaining the 'YesterCode' .... Chapter Five- How this investigation began .... Chapter Six - Jigsaw puzzle fragments and garment threads .... Chapter Seven - In search of the real story .... Chapter Eight - In search of answers .... Chapter Nine - On the side where the moonbeams play .... Chapter Ten - Backseat negotiations .... Chapter Eleven - Who is "Mister Big"? .... This story recommences with new material tomorrow. Today we have added an explanation of our 'YesterPockets' application on our companion blog.
This is a Precursory Chapter Index, meaning that it may differ from the final version in print and it will continually expand as more precursory chapters are added.
Chapter One - What was so "special" about Radio Caroline 1964-1967? .... Chapter Two - The inside untold contextual story of the 'Trio' .... Chapter Three - The letter .... Chapter Four - Applying and explaining the 'YesterCode' .... Chapter Five- How this investigation began .... Chapter Six - Jigsaw puzzle fragments and garment threads .... Chapter Seven - In search of the real story .... Chapter Eight - In search of answers .... Chapter Nine - On the side where the moonbeams play .... Chapter Ten - Backseat negotiations .... The precursor to the book storyline is now appearing on our companion blog in reverse order. In other words, the latest entry is the last entry, but if you were reading this same storyline in a regular book format, the first 'page' would be the beginning of the story. You can read that first page, or at least, the precursor to that first page by clicking here and its free for you to read - at the moment! You will need to read upwards in order to get the next entry, or 'precursory 'chapter'. Just follow the date entries until you reach today's date. That will be the last entry so far. Yes, it is copyright!
Whether Garry Stevens is receiving financial benefits from the very governmental entities he claims to be attacking, is something that needs to be considered. Maybe Garry Stevens is just mentally sick, and maybe he is not. Maybe Garry Stevens is laughing at everyone because he thinks that he can act as he pleases. Does that smack of blackmail? What then? At least UK Met Police should open a file and investigate, although they too have their own catalogue of corruption about their own members of their Force, and what a catalogue of criminal activity that is! Although Garry Stevens is a small floating object in a large political cess pit, his behavior is worth asking about for the following reasons: First, we don't really know who Garry Stevens is as a human person. Garry Stevens' Comment Board is constructed in such a way that its operator and purpose is concealed. Garry Stevens backed and still has contact with the promotion of Paul Rusling's book which in turn backs the fraudulent operation of Malcolm Smith's so-called 'Radio Caroline' which has received some rather interesting 'gifts' from the UK governing powers controlling broadcasting. Yet today, February 8, 2022, Garry Stevens is lampooning with obvious ridicule, the activities of Malcolm Smith's 'Radio Caroline'. This is what Garry Stevens posted on his own board today: "Posted by Garry Stevens on February 8, 2022, 8:24 am .... the Church of the Broken Caroline has no influence what so ever! And those that see it for what it is are able to say so with out the uncontrollable wailing and crying from its disciples that would normally take place on the PM worshipping equivalent of this place. Garry Stevens" So Garry Stevens backs a thief named Paul Rusling who praises this "Church of the Broken Caroline", while at the same time, Garry Stevens is attacking the very same entity that Rusling is praising and making money from. It is a work of theft that Garry Stevens has advertised and promoted free of charge to Rusling. The 'Middle Man' in this charade is someone at Ofcom who allows a license to be granted to a non-existent representative of a fraudulent Companies House registration that was created by the same non-existent person who appears to be a human being who is also represented on official Ofcom and Companies House documentation. Clearly, if UK government documents are really toilet paper having no value and no real meaning, then Garry Stevens, Paul Rusling and Malcolm Smith are all beneficiaries of some sort of 'kick-back' by someone at Ofcom! Ofcom cannot look at this situation and call a lie the truth while their version of truth is proved to be a lie using UK court room definitions of the words truth and lie. Someone needs to own up and fast. Radio Caroline of 1964-1967 has been dead since August 14, 1967, but the lies promoted by Stevens-Rusling-Smith have found their way into mainstream media which includes the UK Crown licensed British Broadcasting Corporation. Clearly it does not take much to make fools out of anoraks, but it obviously takes something of value for Stevens-Rusling-Smith to act as agents of the UK Crown while pretending to be fighting each other and at the same time fighting Ofcom. This is clearly corruption that needs to be stopped, and fast! If you are following the daily updates of the story on our companion blog, please keep in mind that this is a 'first draft', and not the finished work. We also make constant updates to the text to take out typos or to insert more copy. You might notice some of these changes if you make repeated visits to the same text. Later, the storyline now appearing in a daily blog format will be edited into chapter format and the content may be reshuffled. We initially asked for assistance from our readers in the form of proof-reading. Unfortunately there is a group of trolls who misused this facility and think that they are bright and extremely clever in posting daily doses of nonsense, so for the time being we have terminated that facility.
The story behind this investigation into the origins of Radio Caroline in 1964, will be continuing today over on our companion blog.
While our research work is continuing along with pre-publication documentation, it is interesting to note just when the anoraks became a fully accepted part of 'The System' that they claim to be fighting.
Just a moment ago we pulled up this listing from Ofcom: 648 KHz - Suffolk On Air From: 25-11-2017 to: 24-11-2022 Licensee: Radio Caroline AM Broadcasting Ltd Contact Details: Peter Moore Radio Caroline AM Broadcasting Ltd Licence Number: CR101725BA/2 Last Updated : 04/02/2022 06:29:57 hrs Please note the name of the company holding the license and the name of the contact person for this license and company. That person does not exist. Next we draw your attention to this item from the National Archives dated August 14, 2017 and our response below their entry. Our contribution is dated September 24, 2017. Now look at the Ofcom license date for 648 KHz and shown above. It is from November 25, 2017. So before Paul Rusling engaged in theft of our work and tried to twist into his own property by re-promoting the mythology spun by Ian Cowper Ross and Ronan O'Rahilly, the groundwork had already been laid to absorb the dissident anoraks into the very same system which they claim to be attacking in the name of 'free radio'! But what do they call 'free radio'? It is not freedom of speech or freedom of worship or freedom of political expression, because they have diluted 'free radio' to mean freedom for a few (mainly) aging men to nostalgically pretend to be living the lie of a yesterday that never happened, and their leader 'Peter Moore' is as much of a phantom as the character of 'Big Brother' in Orwell's novel 'Nineteen Eighty-Four! But look for yourself: Ofcom bought the lie because Ofcom is part of 'The System' and 'The System' has now absorbed the anoraks! If you are wondering why we are now ignoring the anoraks it is because they have transformed themselves into the very people they claim to be against! In other words the anoraks are now a very junior part of the established system. They have become 'absorbed' into the system, and consequently they now see their self-interest in attacking our work in an effort to silence it. At the moment they are ignoring our work, but when they sporadically reappear it is to make personal attacks but never to debate the issues raised by us.
For the moment, due to work continuing on expanding our library base, and documenting the pre-publication story line on our companion blog, our time and attention is somewhat limited. The expansion of our library includes cataloging the volumes we have been collecting which have now exceeded our original physical shelf space, and this has resulted in us acquiring a larger footprint for shelving by separating the research area into the newly acquired space. So in the meantime, while that physical work continues, and to enable documentation and library resource work to continue Online, we are not updating this blog for the moment. At some point in time the pages on the companion blog which are revealing our story on a daily basis, will be reedited for presentation in book format. Please use our link above to reach our companion blog.
Now the question is, after all of the sniping and refusal to read academic evidence, will the anorak children actually read, comprehend and then wonder if an apology is due? Doubt it. Children who behave like Ronan O'Rahilly are still unruly children. If you are curious, take a look at our companion blog.
If you missed the start you will have to go back a few posts over on our companion blog.
Philip Birch is dead.
Just like the nonsense spewed out about Ronan O'Rahilly, a whitewash is now being put into place regarding the life of Philip Birch and his connection to Don Pierson and the 'Radio KLIF Project'. To learn more about how the dots all connect in a story that anoraks don't know and which anorak publications won't tell you, go to our companion blog for today. Use the link above. Here is Part One of what was to have been a three-part published interview, but the publication died with the publication of Part Two. There was no Part Three. Commentary will follow this text.
So according to Ronan O'Rahilly the ship must have been named after a dance .... cha, cha, cha .... before it was renamed Caroline, and a lot of silly stuff about a broke idiot who swindles his friends in Ireland, arrives in London, gets a down and out flat and suddenly has enough cash to start a radio station. But the best bit is this: "Jimmy" is not even mentioned and neither is Jocelyn Stevens because Ronan hates aristocrats. Since 'Reveille' plugged Radio Atlanta, O'Rahilly should have kissed-up to 'Tit-Bits' which was hardly an aristocratic publication like 'Queen'. If you believe O'Rahilly and any of his silly story you deserve to be a victim of his abuse of the word truth.
You will soon be able to read for yourself what Ronan O'Rahilly is alleged to have said, and what the real truth was behind his lies, right here, beginning in our next edition ....
On November 13, 2014 at BBC Radio Kent, Dave Cash said to Tony Benn sitting opposite him in the studio, that he had read a document by Professor Eric Gilder about Garner Ted Armstrong. Tony Benn said about that nothing would surprise him concerning its veracity. That was quite an admission. You can hear the recording for yourself in our post of yesterday.
"Our post", what is this "our" business? Anoraks continually attack one person and it isn't Professor Dr Habil Eric Gilder. Not surprising really, because the anoraks have probably not read the article that Dave Cash referred to, even though it has been online for years, and what is more, it can be read free of charge. Strange. Until the year 1990, there were comparatively few books dealing with the origins of Radio Caroline in 1964, and most of those were of an amateur nature focusing upon Tony Benn as some sort of political spoil-sport. Prime Minister Harold Wilson hid behind Benn while Benn took the brunt of abuse and ridicule. At one point in the proceedings, Benn even remarked that Wilson was listening to one of the offshore stations, and Benn confirmed that the sound of offshore radio was to be heard in his own home. Politicians in all of the main parties, some more than others, kept raising the issue about passing a law to "suppress" these stations, but Tony Benn refused to attach his name to any Parliamentary Bill with that word in its title. Just before the 1967 Marine Offences Act was presented to Parliament in its final form, Benn was promoted to a higher job that embraced his previous authority, but which gave him a wider responsibility than his job as Postmaster General. By the time all the shouting was over and the Bill had become the Law, the nation did not engage in civil war, and neither did the Labour Party immediately lose office. That change came about due to the financial mismanagement of the British economy and a disaster in the making that involved international loans resulting in a revolt over unemployment by British trade unions. Because Tony Benn was a maverick within his own political party, and because Tony Benn had surrendered a title which had previously placed him briefly in the House of Lords, and because he had married an American wife with the eponymous first name of Caroline, he was a fringe player, but a man who was constantly interested in his own continuing education about the past. However, he was not a total team player when it came to going along with party politics or even national identity as created by the British Establishment. So Tony Benn took a lot of abuse from everyone, and now, in the light of new information it does indeed seem that Tony Benn could have adopted these lyrics for his own anthem: "I've been cheated, been mistreated .... I've been put down, I've been pushed 'round ...." Some years ago on BBC Radio Kent, ex-offshore Radio London dj Dave Cash asked Tony Benn a question about our work, and Tony Benn was quite open and honest in his response .... This article was written around the time that Nicholas Stanley's book 'Radio Man' first came to our attention, and then we began a joint investigation with Chris Edwards of OEM in order to uncover the story behind the mysterious paragraph on its page 276. This is the reference that attributed the beginnings of Radio Caroline to Charles Orr Stanley and his son John who both managed the Pye Group of companies.
Chris Edwards was not the first person to request that his name be removed from our list of contributors due to the highly controversial area into which we began to delve. However, after agreeing to abide by his request, Chris then began making comments on other forums that implied that what we are engaging in is something that he disapproves of. It is true that this investigation is rapidly pulling the rug from underneath the anorak belief system, and unless this contradiction is addressed in OEM, it is likely that upon our own publication in book format of this information, a question of credibility will soon confront Offshore Echos Magazine. However, what is now becoming very obvious is that Tony Benn has been libeled and slandered and that Ronan O'Rahilly has been exalted to a level of admiration that he does not deserve. What allowed the libel and slander to take place was the hidden story of Radio Caroline, which to this day has never been told, except by us! We will be explaining more about the real problem facing Tony Benn and the real reason for the passage into law of the Marine Broadcasting Act of 1967, and its updated by incorporation version into the 1990 Broadcasting Act, within this continuing series of Blog posts. Anoraks are among the most stupid people walking this Planet.
We mean, that group who hide behind fictitious identities and parrot what they were told to parrot by a generation of radio broadcasting anoraks before them. Their great evil seems to be Tony Benn - who they appear to believe was the equivalent of the entity described in a Christian Bible as 'Satan'. Maybe for some anoraks that also includes Prime Minister Harold Wilson and their "abomination of desolation" was that law known as the 1967 Marine Offences Act. For the anoraks that law seems to be the beginning of the worst evil to ever strike the United Kingdom. But why Tony Benn? Because Tony Benn said that the offshore stations of the Sixties were 'pirates' and no nation could allow such disregard for its laws. But what laws were being challenged, and why was Tony Benn so adamant that the offshore stations of the 'SIxties had to be shut down? Tony Benn said that the lack of law enforcement was causing laws to be ignored with impunity. Again, what laws were being ignored before the enactment of the 1967 Marine Offences Act? Therein is the foundational root disease suffered by these radio anoraks: they don't know, they don't care and instead, the flap their gums and now tweeting fingers in the name of 'free radio'. But what freedoms are being discussed, and what freedoms do the anoraks believe that Tony Benn was denying to ordinary people? Was it freedom of political speech? Hardly a cause reflected by the broadcasts of the offshore stations. In fact, in the beginning they were on official record as having told the Liberal Party to take a hike. There would be no political advertising on the original Radio Caroline. Was it freedom of religion? Well the offshore stations sold time to religious broadcasters, but not one of the major programs carried the accent of someone from England, Scotland, Wales or Ireland - north or south. Not one of them was an advocate speaking on behalf of the Vatican (Roman Catholicism), nor a Buddhist, nor a Muslim promoting any version of Islam. No, for the most part they were American voices and with the exception of the Lutherans, they were American fringe groups outside the structure of mainstream American religion. Some, like Billy Graham spoke from a Baptist viewpoint, but Billy Graham was the darling of Queen Elizabeth II and he could be heard (and seen) on transmissions by the British Broadcasting Corporation. He could be seen and heard everywhere. Was it recorded music? Even the often told lie about the shunning of Georgie Fame falls flat when his LP that was released by EMI before the first peep from Radio Caroline is considered. How about Joe Meek and his minor label? He was able to buy time on Radio Luxembourg, years before Radio Caroline first came on the air. So what this clamour for 'free radio' all about? It had a run of several years in several versions to prove its point, but it failed. When the crunch came the British people asked for the Party of Tony Benn to legislate the laws of the United Kingdom. They won by a slim majority, so there was another election and they won that election as well by a nice majority. Then came the Marine Offences Act and Tony Benn was given even more power and authority to enforce that legislation. After 1967 the days of the legitimate offshore radio campaign were over, and a bunch of thieves and crooks moved in. In the Eighties when Americans on Madison Avenue were conned (once again) into believing a ridiculous message about 'Pan-European Advertising', the UK government of that day also took action. Now it was law enforcement reflected in the legislative action of both the Conservative and Labour Parties. So again we ask, why the libel and slander of Tony Benn - especially when it came to 'that' general audience motion picture? We don't know the answer, except that those who libeled and slandered Tony Benn could "get away with it", because he was a political figure. We confess to having held similar views, until we started to dig deep into British history. But what we learned does not support the Anorak libel and slander, it goes to something much more basic and the Anoraks don't want to know. So we continue to research this subject from an academic and forensic standpoint, only to find ourselves at 'war' with the loony Anoraks. They just don't want to know but they can't explain why they don't want to know. Do you know? If its because we make it plain that Ronan O'Rahilly and his ilk were people who used and abused the dumb Anoraks for personal and financial gain, their reaction merely reflects how much of a degenerate mind-set these Anorak cultists have become. Or is it because even their most "sacred cow" is exposed as merely an invented myth, namely that the act of broadcasting from a marine base is something which is almost 'holy' to "their cause" that the BBC could never understand. Except for the fact that back in 1927 the BBC was the first entity to transmit original studio broadcasts to the entire United Kingdom from a vessel. Isn't it funny that the Anoraks 'overlooked' that fact, and they have focused instead upon a publicity stunt that took place later, and it didn't broadcast anything. It merely blasted music over loudspeakers to the shore. Even John Reith noted the aversion by the press in telling the truth about this original BBC claim to fame. It was the press, not the record industry that had most to fear from the beginnings of BBC broadcasting in the United Kingdom. Anoraks have the wrong target because they lack a true foundation in the history of broadcasting, and because they are ignorant, they self-publish idiotic books that glorify events that never happened, and a steady stream of fraudsters who never achieved anything. So we ask you: why the libel and slander of Tony Benn? This is a reproduction of the information required on a section of the official paperwork for Planet Productions Limited, that was submitted in 1965 by Barry Ainley to the Irish government in Dublin.
So where does it say "Place Bros", and where is the connection to John Sheffield? It doesn't say "Place Bros" and neither does it mention Close Bros who had connections to the dry-cleaning business that Ian Cowper Ross' father worked for. His name was not "Jimmy Shaw" or "Jimmy Ross", because neither person existed. Did "Place Bros" exist? Even if it did, that is not what Barry Ainley submitted on this company document. We will!
We are referring to the nonsense that OEM is continuing to remain uncorrected when its editors know about the Caroline fraud. We know because Chris Edwards was our great co-partner in uncovering the rubbish spun by Ronan O'Rahilly by investigating the origins of the claims made by Nicholas Stanley in his book called 'Radio Man'. Just look what both Jocelyn Stevens AND Barry Ainley were doing in 1965. There was NO NEED for a "Jimmy Ross" ..... See our companion Blog for today and then look at this graphic: Oh yes we did! We under-reported the true age of Paul Alexander Rusling a few posts back on our companion Blog. The man that "Sir Hans Knot" equates with "God" as the author of the alternative 'Bible' which he says you should read every day, was eleven years of age, mark that down: 11 years of age in 1964. We admit the error of our ways in making this textual mistake. Now if only the anoraks would admit theirs which are a 'little' more significant.
Lots of redactions, and not a lot of truth telling by the folks responsible for reporting the chronology of events. But yesterday there were dark hints that something awful might occur in 2022, just like they might have happened just prior to the creation of Radio Caroline in 1963. For details please visit our companion Blog using the link above.
|
Our team produced this free radio program for PCRL in Birmingham.
It was repeatedly broadcast on and after October 20, 1985. Click & listen! Blog Archive
August 2023
Copyright 2021 with all rights reserved.
|
Index |
Library |
|