There are so many aspects of this story that involve a lot of specific interest groups which seem to go around and around in circles with their comments.

They are like religious cults in that sense, because their topic subject is also their dogma. To deviate from it, is to deviate from their doctrine. Consequently other factors never come into play, and so they work upon a confirmation bias that cannot reach a resolution. Why? Because they have closed their eyes to the bigger picture which they view as extraneous matter.

In the instance of this Blog the bigger picture is called "oil", or more specifically, offshore natural gas and oil. So before any particular post on this Blog advances too far with detailed information, and then deviates from the trunk of the tree, we will remind you of this basic fact because it took us years to identify it!

The trunk of the tree is called "oil", and we will keep reminding you of what we are investigating, and why we are investigating it.

An example of deviation by confirmation bias leading to obfuscation of the real issue, is found in the 'Declaration of War' by the United Kingdom against Nazi Germany. That document resulted from a failed ultimatum over Poland.

The UK has continued to hammer out the message over its State influenced media, that it got into WWII because Nazi Germany invaded Poland, and Nazi Germany would not withdraw when told to do so by the UK.

But that is an explanation based upon half of the facts in evidence.

In a courtroom demanding the "whole truth", that explanation would be deemed to be a lie.

The real story, which the UK knew, was that Nazi Germany and the USSR had concluded a trade deal involving oil shipments. Those shipments from Baku, USSR, were delivered to the Polish border in train tank cars running on one gauge of rail line. They were then transferred to another train of tank cars at the Polish border which was running on a different gauge of rail line. After the transfer they were taken to Nazi Germany.

This trade deal was then followed by a Nazi Germany and Communist Russia (USSR) 'Non-Aggression Pact'. That Pact was followed by a Nazi invasion from the west of Poland. Seventeen days later, Communist Russia invaded from the east of Poland. But the UK only blamed Nazi Germany for its invasion of Poland.

However, the UK devised a plan to bomb Baku in order to shut off oil shipments that were fueling the Nazi war machine. But that bombing raid never happened. In hindsight, armchair critics have contended that if it had, then the USSR would have joined Nazi Germany to wage war upon the UK. But would it? The USSR would have also been deprived of oil.

Now consider this:

The planned bombing of Baku was also contemplated by the USSR itself - after Nazi Germany broke their 'Non-Aggression Pact' by invading the USSR, because Nazi Germany intended to seize Baku. Although Nazi Germany never made it that far, the USSR dismantled the facilities at Baku and shifted most of them to other oil deposits further in land.

If this bombing by a fleet of both British and French planes (before the fall of France) had taken place, then would the rest of the story have played-out as it is now written?

Think about the bigger picture: Those mass extermination Nazi death camps may never had a chance to be put into operation as part of 'Final Solution'! Yes, the Nazi Germans hated Jews, but Winston Churchill was also blaming 'bad Jews' for being responsible for the creation of the USSR! As long ago as 1920 when Winston Churchill was the MP for Dundee in Scotland, he identified the leader of those 'bad Jews' as being the founder of a Germanic secret society called 'Illuminati'. Winston Churchill was an anti-Semitic conspiracy nutcase, according to today's "wok" standard of judging human behavior!

The USSR ruthlessly exterminated its enemies. They exterminated the Polish soldiers that they captured and then falsely blamed their executions upon the Nazis. But the USSR under Joe Stalin had years of experience at ruthless extermination of its enemies. Joe Stalin was way-ahead of Adolph Hitler in that comparison. Whether Hitler 'caught-up' with Stalin in their race to exterminate human beings is another matter. Communist China may have been a late-comer to this awful 'game' of mass-exterminating enemies, but Mao certainly joined the 'Hall of Infamy' already populated by Stalin and Hitler. Mao was major-league monster. 

This speculation about "what if" is what happens when anyone deviates from the trunk of the tree. The people engrossed in the conspiracy theories surrounding the murder of JFK are also engaged in this useless kind of prattle, and so are the people who devote their lives to the story of broadcasting, both onshore and offshore. But both of those sub-topics are merely branches off the main topic.

That topic, the topic of this Blog, is all about oil.

 It has taken us decades to uncover the real story behind offshore broadcasting, and it seems that to date, no other author has put together the real story. One reason is because the foundation of the story is not about offshore broadcasting, it is about offshore oil.

Uncovering the history of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Trust became the major contribution of Ida Tarbell, many decades ago. Then the U.S. Government took action and it caused that Trust to fragment into what is commonly referred to as the 'seven sisters', and those seven companies have hidden behind as much fake promotion as it has been possible to do, given that their public persona blares out at every filling station selling their products.

'Energy crisis' flashpoints have triggered both frustration on street corner fuel pumps, and hot wars of aggression at foreign pumping and refinery installations. It is the latter that begat the strangest concealment of all, because it relates to the real trigger behind the British entry into World War II.

We did not make either of the two videos below, but they both highlight information that has been obfuscated about events that led up to the United Kingdom declaring war in 1939 on Nazi Germany.  It has been claimed that this formal Declaration of War was caused by the German invasion of Poland, but only later was it revealed that the USSR had an agreement with the Soviet Union to carve-up Poland as equal spoils of war.

So, if the United Kingdom entered WWII to honor its commitment to defend Poland against aggression, why wasn't this first Declaration of War against Nazi Germany on September 1, 1939  followed by a second Declaration of War against Communist Russia on September 17, 1939?

Footnote: The U.S. commentator towards the end of this video confuses pronunciation of Edinburgh, Scotland with Edinburg, Texas.

​Because details of the trade agreement in which the USSR supplied Nazi Germany with fuel to wage war on other nations has become public, it became necessary for the British Crown to engage in a game of 'What if Britain had bombed Baku and shut off the oil supply to Nazi Germany?' The official answer is that the USSR would then have become an active partner with Nazi Germany and declared war on the UK, and consequently Britain would have lost WWII.

But is that true, or is it more British propaganda?

​If Hitler needed Soviet oil to wage his war on other nations, then at the very least his loss of fuel would have led to a reassessment of his own situation, and perhaps a pause in his future plans of conquest. On the other hand, the loss of fuel by the Soviet Union would hinder any immediate plans that it had to wage war in retaliation on the UK.

Therefore the initial cover-up of the joint Nazi Germany - Communist Russia trade agreement, and the subsequent downplaying of the joint invasion of Poland by both Nazi Germany and Communist Russia, is simply a case of more obfuscation to bring about a brainwashed propaganda message to the British people via the British Broadcasting Corporation and other State influenced media to continue to deliver a British perspective of WWII.

The UK still does not have a written constitution, and freedom of its airwaves is still not a factor today, anymore than freedom of the press was a factor in the days of Freeborn John Lilburne.

No matter how much idealism was involved, underwriting the first offshore station required a knowledge of national laws and international treaties, and that was not the domain of teenagers having a good time listing to the radio. Neither was the choice of location for the original station. It was at the chokehold of the Baltic Sea which is where the USSR had a fleet of surface ships and submarines ready to turn the Cold War into World War III. But for those vessels to serve any purpose they had to get out of the Baltic Sea and into the North Sea.

Another overlooked vital piece of information is the real story behind the United States Coast Guard Cutter 'Courier' which was eventually anchored off Greece. Offshore broadcasting idealists have oft-cited this ship, but little did they seem to know its back story. That ship was a  stopgap measure, and it was based upon a failed attempt at offshore broadcasting by the US Navy during World War II. How do we know this? Because it is part of the official U.S. government records that explained both the financing and purpose of the floating 'Voice of America' station. Unfortunately the pop writers did not do the research required, and so they never read this foundational information.

Just like a pebble thrown into a pond that causes ripples to spread in all directions, so this story about offshore broadcasting is also linked to those initial ripples. But offshore radio was not the cause of that first splash. It was caused by a Texas company dropping anchor for the first time as part of their quest to find and exploit natural gas and oil deposits under the waters of the North Sea. Meanwhile a fleet of U.S. nuclear submarines based in Scotland sent one of their number to stand guard at that same gateway to the Baltic Sea, and that is where the first commercial offshore station was located.

Clearly from reading the background to the Danish Nazi Party, it is obvious that no one forced Alex Brask Thomsen to help create this fledgling political group, which even its original leader decided to desert - before Alex Brask Thomsen claims that he quit when the Germans invaded Denmark. So therefore it is worth taking a much closer look at all those who later involved themselves with the offshore station Radio Mercur, because nothing about offshore broadcasting is what it has been claimed to be.

The location is Jutland and it is a peninsula that is central to explaining the background to our investigation, because this is the location where the subjects of offshore oil and offshore radio collide.

This is where Jutland is located in relationship to Demark and Germany. Its borderlands contain ethnic minorities from both Denmark and Germany - on opposite sides of the two borders:

This is where the Nazi Third Reich took its last stand with a de facto and de jure government ....

 Alex Brask Thomsen emerged from this geographical area of Jutland bordering both Denmark and Germany, and became a founding member of the Hitler-era Danish Nazi Party, and then, after World War II he became the financier underwriting the offshore station Radio Mercur. It is therefore unfortunate that his family members commissioned his autobiography to be written in such a way that it became merely a non-controversial tribute, and not an in-depth account of his life. To find his real story, is necessary to seek the facts elsewhere by following oblique references that are within the book.

Clearly there are a lot of people with a lot of vested interests who do not want the true story that links the roots of offshore broadcasting to the roots of the North Sea Oil and Natural Gas industry, because some of those roots are derived from the original Nazi Era of Gas Chambers. But if the true story is to be told, then it has to be told in context with as many of the real facts that can be retrieved from the censored past. That is the story we will continue to reveal here, in depth, day after day. Eventually we will synthesize it into book format. We are of course well aware that a lot of people still revert to the old line that they just didn't know the entire Nazi agenda. Well, whether they did, or whether they didn't know is besides the point, because they all contributed to a yesterday that they pretend never happened. But unfortunately, it did.

LBJ was first "inaugurated" on a jet parked at a Dallas airfield, after the previous president had part of his head blown off. So the Vice-President became President for the remainder of the term won by John F. Kennedy. When it came to his own election in 1964, he could not ask the previous president to attend and validate a transfer of power, so he asked the president before John F. Kennedy. That was President Eisenhower, and he refused, in a very polite manner!

 On January 17, 1961, President Eisenhower in his final address to the U.S. nation warned viewers about the dangers of the Military Industrial Complex. It had been created in response to the Cold War which followed on from the nuclear conclusion of World War II. Of course the Internet owes its foundational existence to the academic aspects of the Military Industrial Complex, but in today's world nothing, especially the Military Industrial Complex, could function without oil. That is the vital ingredient that makes everything in today's world function. Whoever controls the oil supply ultimately controls everything else, and that once included the political career of Lyndon Baines Johnson. [Note: This video has been edited by us to include an excerpt from the introduction to the last television address by President Eisenhower. It then quickly moves on to that now often cited portion of his speech in which he drew attention to the ad hoc activities of academia and industry who were working together in secrecy for the benefit of the U.S. Armed Forces, and all deriving their funding from U.S. taxpayers via the U.S. Treasury.]

On January 20, 2021, as dawn broke in Washington, D.C., preparations were still being made to transfer power from one living President of the USA to another. The formal staged transfer would occur at approximately Noon on that same day, outside the West Front wing of the U.S. Capitol building.

It was a surreal moment in the midst of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic where everyone was required to wear face masks. It was also a heavily restricted event that was enforced by armed and facially concealed troops.

When the Presidential Oath of Office was finally administered that day by the U.S. Supreme Court Justice, both he and presidential candidate Joe Biden slipped off their masks to face each other. It was then, at that moment when the office of President was officially and peacefully transferred to Joe Biden from the previous office holder, Donald Trump.

But several decades before that event, and at approximately thirty minutes past Noon on the afternoon of November 22, 1963, the office of President was violently, but officially transferred to Lyndon Baines Johnson. The trigger-causing event that begat that transfer, was when a bullet blew away part of the brain of President John F. Kennedy.

It was a bright sunny day and on busy city street in Dallas, Texas when John Kennedy lost his life. A short time later on that same day, away from the crowds and on board an isolated jet on a Dallas runway, the Oath of Office was administered to President Lyndon Baines Johnson.

No one wore masks that day in 1963, and everything was in plain sight. Yet everything about that day has been turned into a mystery. It was certainly a turning point in American politics.

How quickly we forget just how strange and how awful the events of yesterday really were! Let us recall that in 1963 the assassination of President Kennedy was followed by an avalanche of conspiracy theories and allegations about Lyndon Baines Johnson.

The landslide of non-certified claims about voter fraud following the election of 2020, are nothing compared to the heavily documented voter fraud of 1948 that was engineered on behalf of Lyndon Baines Johnson. A few year later, fingers again began to point in his direction as a criminal when he became the chief beneficiary to the murder of President Kennedy.

If Lyndon Baines Johnson was involved in the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy, then on November 22, 1963, a Texas crime boss became President of the USA. This alleged criminal was also linked to a number of other murders, not as the trigger-man, but as one of the masterminds. These were events that paved the way for Johnson's progressive rise to the office of President, and it was as President Johnson that his record blossomed into a war-mongering despot sending thousands to premature deaths as part of a war for profit centered upon the nation of Vietnam.

So far there is no scale upon which to compare the consequential events of November 2020, to the events of November 1963. In 2020 there was an election for president. In 1963, there was a public execution of the elected President.

That killing enabled a transfer of power to Lyndon Baines Johnson.

The thread that links the 1963 murder to a transfer of power is oil, and the people who looked to exploit that oil with drilling rigs, also exploited the career of Lyndon Baines Johnson with bank notes. To claim "their" oil, the drillers needed contracts and legal permissions. They also needed demand for product, and as President, Lyndon Baines Johnson could facilitate both requirements.

President Kennedy had been engaged in trying to restrict profits enjoyed by oilmen who collectively huddled for discussions about remedying this situation from the now infamous hotel room number 8F, which was once located in the City of Houston, Texas. 

But there are also trickle-down sub-plots to this story, and they involve broadcasting.

That sub-plot is a part of the bigger picture of this same story.

Broadcasting can be a very noisy and distracting affair, and so it was with the jingles and Top 40 sounds of the Fifties and Sixties that distracted the attention away from the core of this tale. By only following the sub-plots which have been deliberately surrounded by misinformation, it is possible to waste an incredible amount of time recreating memories of a yesterday that never happened. Others have tried to do just that by confirmation bias. But many end up by attempting to hammer square pegs into round holes.

Everyone engaged in research has to use a hypothesis against which to try available evidence, but when the original hypothesis is not supported by the evidence, the initial hypothesis has to be discarded and a new hypothesis put into its place, and then the search for an answer has to begin anew. This is how both police investigations into cold cases, and medical research into the cure for diseases, and scientists seeking to understand the cause and consequence of life on this Planet and the possibilities for life on other planetary bodies, all attempt to find solutions to their unsolved problems.

But by rigidly focusing on a belief system in support of a predetermined and inflexible confirmation bias, it is not only possible, but more than probable that the big picture will become totally obfuscated from view. If a researcher does not know that a bigger picture exists, and if existing beliefs preclude the ability to even search for one, then it is doubtful that  the bigger picture will even be known.

In this instance we are now aware of the bigger picture, and that is why we turned our own time clock back to the Nineteenth Century and the pioneering work of people like Ida Tarbell. This investigative reporter identified for us the trunk of the tree, and that allowed us to then place the various branches of this story on the trunk of that tree.

This is a story that affects the lives of millions of people who are alive today, and it is a big story about life and death events that did happen, but which became obfuscated by false leads and total guesswork as to their raison d'etre.

Like all true crime stories, and this is a true crime story, because its actors and their actions are all contrary to accepted human rights laws of behavior, the persons involved with criminal activity that has taken place rarely explain their actions. This true crime story is no exception to that rule.

The evidence is available, but it remains scattered like a jigsaw picture that has been knocked off a table and broken into fragmented segments. The big picture is no longer immediately visible, but it does come back into focus when all of the fragments are reassembled. However, in this instance, some of the pieces which have been missing, are now being recovered.

With both the passage of time and the advance of Online technological library facilitation, some of those missing pieces have now begun to reappear in various forums and formats, but they have not as yet been reassembled to form the bigger picture. Some of those missing pieces are in old newspaper accounts that when first published raised more questions than provide answers. But time has marched on and those old reports have become available again.

Today a large number of individuals and organizations have been reexamining the facts in evidence surround the the cold case murder of John F. Kennedy. Because that crime took place at a fixed moment in time, it is also possible to layer other events that are also related to that central event in order to form the bigger picture.

This is why we have begun to place the advent of Radio Caroline in March 1964, into the time sequence of events surrounding the murder of President Kennedy in November 1963, because they both occupy the same time frames; some of the same people, and underlying both is one common area of interest: the exploration and laying of claims to riches derived from the 'Black Gold' that had been lurking unclaimed beneath the waters of the North Sea.

[Text amended by edits on 1/21/2021.] Tomorrow we will begin to assemble the seemingly convoluted parts of this story, by placing them into a more understandable timeline.