To understand the origins and development of British broadcasting it is necessary to know what the term 'British broadcasting' actually means.
To many, it means BBC plus additives, such as ITA and then IBA.
But it is a lot more than that, and it always has been.
However, it has always been in the interests of the British Crown to obfuscate what it means, and so the perception that British broadcasting is BBC plus additives, suits the British Crown just fine. So we suppose the question should really be: What is the British Crown?
After all, if the BBC (plus additives) only exist courtesy of the British Crown, then the British Crown must have power that the hoi polloi do not have, because if they did, there would be no such thing as "pirate broadcasting".
The British Crown is based upon a myth that it actually exists as an entity, and not as a bluff founded upon hocus-pocus history. It is really about the folks who dish out titles to one another (as well as to a few meaningless titles to the hoi polloi), in order to create the impression that Queen this or that, and Prince this or that, or the Right Honorable this or that, and all of the other silly names you can think of, are a species of human being who do not eat, fart, shit, and die like the rest of humanity, or, that they came to be, one self-important human being at a time, via a sexual act that took place by injecting a male sperm into the ovum of a female human being. But that is indeed what happened and what will happen to these titled personages.
Every human being is born to die.
So how did a cluster of human beings get together in a huddle and form that club known as the 'British Crown' and get away with palming it off on the hoi polloi, that this cluster of human beings have some sort of secret additive that the rest of humanity does not?
The answer is that they do not have any secret additive, and each one of them is born to die as an individual human being, just like all other human beings.
This factor establishes a questionable foundation for British broadcasting, meaning, broadcasting for all of the human beings living within the British Isles. Because if the domestic version is not something that is called for, but imposed by the British Crown, and if it is the collective voice of the British Crown that has been blasted abroad over the decades, then the entire scheme of British broadcasting is but a fake institution imposed upon the majority of human beings living in the British Isles.
And that is exactly what it is, a system imposed by lies and deceit that began with one puffed-up individual telling everyone else that he knew what was good for everyone else, and that everyone else was waiting to be told what was good for them. His name was John Reith, and he was the son of a preacher man, and just like that song, he thought that he was the only one who could ever teach you. (Click.) He said so in 1924 within his own autobiography. That is the volume that explains how he came to be in charge of the British Broadcasting Company Limited, and then the British Broadcasting Corporation.
But through the years several other broadcasters have been operating in the British Isles, not as unlicensed 'pirates', but as official voices, and they have done so "by permission" of the British Crown. They have been able to do this by hiding under a cloud of obscurity that enables the mythology to continue that the BBC (and its additives), are all that there is on the airwaves. The term "by permission" is in quotation marks because the British Crown really has no permission to give. But you have been led to believe that it does!
However, in this world it is "might make right", not law, but might that controls human interactions. The might that it takes to arrest a human being and imprison them, or worse. But the joke is on the majority of human beings who put up with this nonsense and do not stop to wonder who these few human beings are, or why anyone else pays attention to them.
We addressed this very issue in an academic paper some years ago, and you can access it here, by clicking this button:
Now if you are wondering what this has to do with the main topic, please refer back to the monologue of Steve Martin which we linked before, and you can access again with the button below:
Then there is this classic advice from George Carlin:
Now come back down to Earth.
You are one human being born to die and so are the clique who call themselves the British Crown. But there is much that this clique do not want you to know, and that is what we will be explaining, and that explanation includes the basis in which this clique came to set up their own rules concerning the conductivity of mass communications in the British Isles.
It is not just about John Reith's BBC (and its additives), but Sefton Delmer and all of his activities. The British Crown admits to having meddled with soap operas by implanting polemical information within those scripts, but they pretend that they had no hand in the lies taunting war victims, or the pornography designed to induce anger, or the religious broadcasts made in the name of God that were intended to show that the Almighty was on their side in time of war.
If you think that the deviant side of British broadcasting was a one time episode, think again, and think again if you think that the 'God Factor' was not, and is not, one of the greatest tools of mass deception that the British Crown has used to manipulate the masses via British broadcasting.
Others won't spell it out, but we will, and we will back-up what we assert with documentation, but what we won't do, is engage in cultist conspiratorial nonsense that smears without requiring connectivity that can be proven - courtroom style.
Stay tuned, and tell others about this ongoing work!
'Jumble Show' seems to be an appropriate name for the BBC media monopoly that pretends that it is not. It claims that it is not, due to all of its supposed competitive rivals, but none of them have the backing of the Crown in the way that the BBC does.
The BBC is still tied to a licence fee - even though it pretends that it is not, and the enforcement of that licence fee comes with the stomp of the Crown in jackboots. It is called British law and order.
How this all came to be is quite a tale and it is a tale wrapped in confused explanations to the point that most people don't care what the explanation is, they just accept it as part of life in that part of the British Isles dominated by the Crown. (Ireland is not a part of the Crown, but what it is - is still a mystery with regards to that chunk of the island called 'Northern'.)
But the BBC, that is 'THE' BBC, is the master of confusion, obfuscation and deranged thinking when it comes to mass media programming.
You might think that 'THE' BBC and its Masters who do the bidding of the Crown corporation sole that that brought it into existence, explain to the hoi polloi everything that the hoi polloi need to know to live a tranquil life (and not cause the Crown too much trouble as it marches on through the centuries.) But it does so by making everything to do with geopolitics as clear as mud,
Its methodology is jumbling fact with fiction and time sequences as though they are part of a lucky dip game. It is a 'Jumble Show' of confusion.
In the last Blog, we referred back to Winston Churchill and his 1920 full page article in a Scottish newspaper in which he blamed 'bad Jews' for creating the USSR, or 'Communist Russia Plus', to those wondering what the USSR was. To do so Winnie, linked the 'bad Jews' to a man named Adam Weishaupt, or as he called himself 'Brother Spartacus' - only Churchill referred to him as 'Spartacus Weishaupt' just to make that which was already confusing - far more confused.
We explained in the last Blog that Adam Weishaupt founded a flash-in-the-pan 'secret society' called 'Illuminati' that took off like a lead brick. That is, until Churchill got hold of the idea in his full page 1920 Scottish newspaper article. (At the time, Churchill was the British MP for Dundee in Scotland, in case you are wondering how Churchill ended up north of the border of England.)
But there is more to this confusion: Weishaupt was in Bavaria, and that is where Adolph Hitler first attempted to overthrow a Germanic government. Hitler failed. At the time Adolph was upset with a bunch of Germanic communists who called themselves 'Spartacus', but they were not commemorating Adam Weishaupt, but a gladiator from long, long, long ago before Adam, and this warrior was named 'Spartacus'.
Now these German Spartacus imitators were trying to bring about the kind of revolution that Churchill had blamed on 'bad Jews' in Russia. These are all contemporary events with Winnie's newspaper article. Except that Adam and his failed secret society called 'Illuminati' were not in the picture at all - apart that is, from Winnie dragging in his reference to 'Spartacus Weishaupt', and of course, blaming it all on the "bad Jews".
Today, Winnie would be labeled as an anti-Semite.
Now jump forward in time to dear young Sophia of 'TikTok' - BBC World Service 'fame'. Sophia Smith Galer (courtesy of Facebook), wants her 'fans' (she is a 'star' on 'TikTok'), to believe that the modern day revival of the Illuminati conspiracy theory is actually tied to a lawyers office copying machine in Dallas, Texas. That copying machine peeled off five copies of a book about a dystopian joke religion that Sophia claims has its roots in the 'Illuminati' cult - as if there is such a thing outside of the tin hats of people like Churchill, and the idiots at the BBC.
But of course Sophia, who is paid by the BBC World Service to promote nonsense, got her cities and states confused. Because upon delving into Sophia's story we find the lawyer in question, was the same person who first promoted a conspiracy story about the murder John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. But unfortunately for Sophia, that lawyer was in New Orleans, Louisiana. It was JFK who was in Dallas, Texas - which is not to say that many of the powerful families of oil rich Texas did not hate John F. Kennedy and wanted to see him die as fast as possible.
Their wish came true on November 22, 1963.
How about the 'Illuminati'?
Ask Sophia and her sponsors: 'THE' all-knowing, all-seeing and all-too-confusing BBC. They made up that story just as Winnie made up the original story about 'bad Jews' in Russia. Get the connection? 'Bad Jews in Russia' followed by 'Bad Jews in Germany'. There is some sick form of irony at work here that puts the foundational ideology of Winnie on the same team as Adolph.
But that is the idea, isn't it?
'THE' BBC does not exist to inform and enlighten, but to confuse to the point of total frustration where the viewer and listener says "I give up".
How did this foundational ideology get going?
Ask John Reith back in 1924 who spelled it all out when he cobbled together 'THE' BBC. Winnie and John were rivals because they both had big egos and both egos could not exist in the same time and space.
But come WWII and Winnie's fight with another man named Adolph (who also had a big ego), caused Winnie to create a secret society of his own - to fight Adolph - "off the record".
If you thought that the BBC was the lone official broadcaster in Britain, think again. The Crown made the BBC very public, but it kept its 'other' operation very, very secret.
It was dirty, nasty, vicious and without any care or feelings for those it intended to hurt. Who were they? Not the top Nazis, but the Mom and Pops and kids who did what they were told according to what they heard from their wretched government. On the other hand, the British Crown was so bad and uncaring that the Lord Privy Seal figured that it would be better to lose than use the same Nazi methodology - only England under Edward I (go back to the year 1297!) was the prototype of Heinrich Himmler and his desire to exterminate the Jews - (move forward in time from 1297 to Wannsee in 1942)!
Winnie created his own secret version of BBC and it broadcast over what was claimed to be the world's biggest radio transmitter. It was made by RCA in the USA and shipped to the UK and installed in an underground bunker in England. Over time a lot of mythology has come to surround this device because it was obtained and used at the time in total secrecy. It was called 'Aspidistra', which is a tiny house plant!
However, this RCA manufactured and imported transmitter was actually one of several smaller units and both individually and collectively they were all identified as 'ASPI's, but because this RCA unit was so powerful, it was called 'Aspidistra'.
Unfortunately in doing so, the engineers created an oxymoron, because if the RCA until was gigantic and the Aspidistra house plant is so small, why give it that name? Well popular legend has it that this RCA transmitter was named after a popular song by Gracie Fields, except that the record label in the UK, and its rereleases aboard, claimed that Gracie was singing about an 'Aspidastra' - a plant that became a tree - which never existed.
Gracie's house plant turned into a kind of 'Jack In The Beanstalk' unique tree by means of grafting an acorn to the house plant, and that resulted in the 'The Biggest Aspidastra In the World'.
Now, listen carefully to Gracie sing her song - with her very strong regional accent and 'Aspidastra' sounds like 'Aspidestra'.
What it does not sound like is 'Aspidistra'.
If 'THE BBC' can't even tell the truth about an RCA transmitter that was bought by the Crown for use by another and highly secret British broadcasting organization dealing in pornography, lies and mean-spirited exploitation of war victims, what else can't it tell you the truth about?
For one thing in can't tell you the truth about the origins of Radio Caroline in 1964.
It was 'THE BBC' that allowed Ian Cowper Ross to go on television in 1991 and tell viewers that his book that was published the year before in 1990, was not so much a novel work of fiction, but a disguised version of his own life story.
But that was a lie and his 1990 book was indeed a work of fiction.
However, there then followed a stream of writers who embodied this fictitious tale into their own works, and every one of them claimed that it was the truth.
But it was not: it was a lie!
So there you go: 'THE' BBC spreads confusing misinformation whenever any of its many transmitters are turned on, and so it is no wonder that it was 'THE' BBC in 1991 that created the mythological story about Radio Caroline in 1964, all with the help of Ian Cowper Ross.
The moral of this explanation is this:
Don't trust anything that someone says is true, unless you have used courtroom due diligence to check it out!
Okay, so a bunch of human beings stuck Winston Churchill on a pedestal to be worshipped as some sort of Patron Saint of Deliverance from Hitler, and we are all supposed to revere his legacy.
Now Churchill did pull out all the stops so that the defeat of Hitler justified the means in doing so. That is, if you know how Hitler gained his power in the first place, and if you know what Churchill eventually did to get rid of Hitler.
Most people don't.
Most people see the sanitized version that looks as if it popped out of a box of cornflakes as a plastic gift for kids. Hollywood and the BBC have helped to create that image. But we look inside the cornflake box and notice a few contaminants surrounding the wrapping.
For instance, look back a few entries on this Blog and notice our earlier comments about Churchill. They are in the context of that "tin hat" subject called 'Illuminati': the that one that conspiratorialists like to refer to, in order to give you a two-second explanation for all the world's ills. But like most subjects we will tackle, there is a mixture of truth mixed-in with the fiction surrounding Churchill.
In 1920, Churchill was blasting Jews for creating the nation that became the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics - the USSR. In 1920, Churchill linked those Jews to "Spartacus Weishaupt". Now there really was a man named Weishaupt. His first name is Adam, because although he is dead, he kept the name. Adam Weishaupt founded a secret society on May 1, 1776 in Bavaria, which is now a part of Germany.
Weishaupt called himself 'Brother Spartacus', and he linked his cause back in time before this Common Era. Adam named himself after a Thracian gladiator called Spartacus who met his end at about age 40 in 71 BCE, while this warrior was fighting slavery. But Brother Spartacus was not fighting slavery, in fact, it is difficult to fully comprehend what this philosopher and professor of law was fighting against. In any event Adam Weishaupt's secret society called Illuminati fizzled out.
But, in Bavaria during Churchill's time, Adolph Hitler began a political fight against people who rallied under a Spartacus banner and they were trying to imitate those Jews that Churchill bashed in his newspaper article, because they were 'inspiring' Germans to copy the Communists who overthrew the Russian monarchy and created the USSR.
So what's the connection to Adam Weishaupt?
There is no connection.
Now ask the BBC this question: Who created the modern-day 'Illuminati' conspiracy theories? Their mouthpiece named Sophia will point to a lawyer's office in Dallas, Texas. The trouble with her explanation is that the lawyer she points to on behalf of the BBC, was in the State of Louisiana, not Texas.
President John F. Kennedy got killed in Dallas, Texas and the lawyer in Louisiana came up with a conspiracy theory about who killed him. But the BBC are paying a young lady full of hot air to work for their World Service and tell BBC listeners and viewers everything that she and the BBC do not know about the Illuminati, by pretending that they do.
Check her out: Her name is Sophia Smith Galer, and she claims to be a TikTok 'star', and that's apparently all the qualifications she needs to bamboozle the BBC World Service audience in her link to Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/watch/?v=518436448988600&_rdr
In other words, Sophia Galer who claims to be a "visual faith and ethics journalist" - whatever that is in BBC-speak - doesn't know what she is talking about, but then, neither do the people who run the BBC.
Or do they?
We think that they do and that they just lie and make stuff up just like Ian Cowper Ross and his explanation about how Radio Caroline began.
Actually, Sophia should study her claimed subject of speciality, and she implies that it includes aspects of religion, because the subject of religion is at the foundational root of both the BBC and the geopolitics that surround it. There is a long history of religious broadcasting in the British Isles that is tied to the creation of the BBC. It's a geopolitical gimmick and one of the broadcasting tricks that Churchill used to defeat Hitler.
It is also the storyline behind the story that continues from there into emanations by Radio Caroline which was bouncing around in the North Sea during the Nineteen Sixties.
If you are a tin hat airhead Anorak, turn away from this site now - you won't like the Blog entries to follow, and you will positively hate them in manuscript book format at a later date!
While the British 'Black' broadcasting stations remain mysterious fragments within a British mass media story, its 'rival' British Broadcasting Corporation stations seem to have been documented to death. But are all those retellings of the past, true accounts, or are they fiction mixed together with some true accounting of events?
The same scenario and resulting question also applies to the sudden emergence of British offshore broadcasting stations in the Nineteen Sixties. That scenario ended in 1967, but it suddenly came to life as a roman a clef story in 1990, and as a BBC-TV documentary in 1991.
The TV show of 1991 claimed that the 1990 book was no novel, but a semi-concealed autobiography. That book referred to a family named Shaw, and the primary storyteller on the 1991 TV documentary was also the author of the novel. He stated that the novel was actually a disguised version of true events, and because it was autobiographical in style, it meant that Ian Cowper Ross who wrote the roman a clef novel, was really writing his own autobiography about himself and his family named Ross.
In this way the character in the book who was named Jim Shaw, became Charles Edward Ross, if Ian Cowper Ross was telling the truth. He was not.
But after the 1991 TV documentary, a floodgate was opened and a stream of books began to appear that turned Charles Edward Ross into an amalgamated creation of fantasy named 'Jimmy Ross'. He was a man who never existed, and 'Jimmy Ross' who never existed, was credited in all the books that followed as the man who financed 'Radio Caroline'.
The problem is that no company called Radio Caroline was ever registered in the UK or anywhere else during the formation time period in question. More than this, the name 'Caroline' was allegedly derived from a young girl around 5 years old whose name was Caroline, but the connection was made to this young girl by another man who claimed to have been on a trip when he read about the five years old. Another problem, the man who made that claim never went on that trip and the article he claimed to have read did not exist.
Now the mother of the 5 years old did exist, she was Jackie Kennedy, and about 5 days after the murder of her husband John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Jackie made up a story about an event named 'Camelot' that was supposed to have depicted her late husband's fantasy world. But again, Jackie Kennedy lied, and that connection to the show 'Camelot' cannot be made.
Everyone has lied.
The history of the British Broadcasting Corporation is no exception, and when it comes to the ultra-secret world of pornographic and fake religious 'Black' broadcasting in World War II, the story becomes even more obfuscated. Yet, there are fragments of truth is all of these events, and that is why we created the YesterCode to enable us to take these fragments, search for missing pieces, and put them together in the context of time and place, just like any detective trying to solve a murder mystery.
Therefore it will come as no surprise that the madness of 'Mr Tin Hat' Winston Churchill in his 1920 rant about 'good Jews' and 'bad Jews' and the rebirth of a secret cult known as 'Illuminati', does contain elements of true events, even though Churchill did not put anything in context and left it to a future generation of nutcases to start inventing their own claims that the 'Illuminati' are behind everything that is wrong with the present world. Ditto for the BBC explanation about the modern day origins of the 'Illuminati'.
What we are in the final stages of now putting together, is the first book in a series of volumes that debunk the 'tin hat' nutcase claims. This includes the fake histories of both land and offshore broadcasting. We are doing it segments on this Blog, but it will appear in manuscript form as a book, later this year.
Anoraks had 80 days to challenge our research. They remained silent. Instead they used silly names to hide behind and made personal attacks on individuals, but on substance they were silent. Now they are no more. They will be totally ignored as silly children throwing tantrums, or worse, as con men who steal for personal gain. Here is a reminder of how our Countdown began ....
The Countdown has begun ....4/26/2021
While we are still undertaking a lot of basic research, we have now reached the point where a lot of the mysteries have now been resolved, although they have not necessarily been revealed here on this Blog so far. One of the biggest problems that we have faced, has been in knowing that the story as told by Skues, Clark, Rusling and others is bogus, but in not having some key connecting dots that join together a large volume of newly researched and genuine material that we now have which explains the actual story which the bogus story has been concealing.
For some time we have been able to demolish the false stories that have been spread by Skues, Clark, Rusling and the rest, but until now, we have not been able to explain what really happened. Now we can.
We have finally made a breakthrough and found some of the missing pieces that create an entirely different narrative and which explain why that bogus story was created and maintained. While we certainly do not have all of the missing pieces, we now have enough material to reveal both what really did happen back at the dawn of the Nineteen Sixties, and we will be presenting a new account of those events.
If we were to continue to reveal aspects of our discoveries we would be taking away from the totally new picture that we will be revealing. Since August 14 seems to be an interesting date, that is that date this year when we will begin to pull back the curtain and reveal what we have discovered. It is not a variation on the old and bogus mythology, it is an entirely new and different explanation of events that led up to the creation in 1964 of the offshore station called 'Radio Caroline', and why the original intellectual property that Rusling stole from us and tried to incorporate into his bogus 'bible', was merely an attempt by him to bash square pegs into round holes. Our research documentation does not fit into his fake narrative.
To coin a phrase, stay tuned, because the countdown has begun:
.... you do know that you have to click the button, don't you?