PEBBLE
THEATRE |
6 |
3 - TO BE EDITED
|
|
During the latter part of the 1950s, Capitol Records bought time on the English language 'Radio Luxembourg' nighttime service which was originally called 'Luxembourg 2'. Its host was Canadian Ray Orchard who began with a fanfare and then a riff from the 'Main Title'. [Click the image to the left.] While it was playing, Ray would tell his listeners the names of the artists that he would be introducing from excerpts to their records. But it was his opening words that are relevant here, because Ray would ask listeners "Well, whadya know?", and while his answer was 'It's the Capitol Show!', our question remains to be answered by you.
|
Alan Bailey, who was a London recording engineer for 'Radio Luxembourg' programs, noted in his own book that his account is "seen through my eyes between 1958 and 1975." As an avid listener, one of our Trio began listening to '208' somewhere around 1956 when it truly was the 'Station of the Stars' because in carried a lot of US radio network programming, and not just record shows. Therefore the account of that period rendered by Alan Bailey, rests upon his own investigation into the years prior to his employment. Unfortunately, there are very few books that authentically document details of '208' programing in the 1950s, which means that it is necessary to find old program guides in order to discover what they were actually broadcasting. It is all about the timing of acquired knowledge relating to the past.
On June 25, 1973, US Senator Howard Baker posed a question to a witness about US President Richard Nixon. It was during the Watergate Hearings, and it is a question which has application to this investigation. Baker asked: "What did the President know and when did he know it?"
It is now time to ask our readers:
"What do you know about the advent of 'Radio Caroline' in 1964, and when did you first claim to know it?"
During the latter part of the 1950s, Capitol Records bought time on the English language 'Radio Luxembourg' nighttime service which was originally called 'Luxembourg 2'. Its host was Canadian Ray Orchard who began with a fanfare and then a riff from the 'Main Title'. While it was playing, Ray would tell his listeners the names of the artists that he would be introducing from excerpts to their records. But it was his opening words that are relevant here, because Ray would ask listeners "Well, whadya know?", and while his answer was 'It's the Capitol Show!', our question remains a question to be answered by you.
Alan Bailey, who was the London recording engineer for 'Radio Luxembourg' programs, noted in his own book that his account is "seen through my eyes between 1958 and 1975." As an avid listener, one of our Trio began listening to '208' somewhere around 1956 when it truly was the 'Station of the Stars' because in carried a lot of US radio network programming, and not just record shows. Therefore the account of that period rendered by Alan Bailey, rests upon his own investigation into the years prior to his employment. Unfortunately, there are very few books that authentically document details of '208' programing in the 1950s, which means that it is necessary to find old program guides in order to discover what they were actually broadcasting. It is all about the timing of acquired knowledge relating to the past.
On June 25, 1973, US Senator Howard Baker posed a question to a witness about US President Richard Nixon. It was during the Watergate Hearings, and it is a question which has application to this investigation. Baker asked: "What did the President know and when did he know it?"
It is now time to ask our readers:
"What do you know about the advent of 'Radio Caroline' in 1964, and when did you first claim to know it?"
On June 25, 1973, US Senator Howard Baker posed a question to a witness about US President Richard Nixon. It was during the Watergate Hearings, and it is a question which has application to this investigation. Baker asked: "What did the President know and when did he know it?"
It is now time to ask our readers:
"What do you know about the advent of 'Radio Caroline' in 1964, and when did you first claim to know it?"
During the latter part of the 1950s, Capitol Records bought time on the English language 'Radio Luxembourg' nighttime service which was originally called 'Luxembourg 2'. Its host was Canadian Ray Orchard who began with a fanfare and then a riff from the 'Main Title'. While it was playing, Ray would tell his listeners the names of the artists that he would be introducing from excerpts to their records. But it was his opening words that are relevant here, because Ray would ask listeners "Well, whadya know?", and while his answer was 'It's the Capitol Show!', our question remains a question to be answered by you.
Alan Bailey, who was the London recording engineer for 'Radio Luxembourg' programs, noted in his own book that his account is "seen through my eyes between 1958 and 1975." As an avid listener, one of our Trio began listening to '208' somewhere around 1956 when it truly was the 'Station of the Stars' because in carried a lot of US radio network programming, and not just record shows. Therefore the account of that period rendered by Alan Bailey, rests upon his own investigation into the years prior to his employment. Unfortunately, there are very few books that authentically document details of '208' programing in the 1950s, which means that it is necessary to find old program guides in order to discover what they were actually broadcasting. It is all about the timing of acquired knowledge relating to the past.
On June 25, 1973, US Senator Howard Baker posed a question to a witness about US President Richard Nixon. It was during the Watergate Hearings, and it is a question which has application to this investigation. Baker asked: "What did the President know and when did he know it?"
It is now time to ask our readers:
"What do you know about the advent of 'Radio Caroline' in 1964, and when did you first claim to know it?"
Many people now confuse the timing of when they think that they first came to know about 'Radio Caroline'. Was it from information written after 1990, or was it from the limited amount of information available prior to that date?
Readers who were too young to remember anything about events in 1964 tend to assume that information added after 1990, is a true representation of information available prior to that date. But such is not the case.
Of the generation who were alive and cognisant of events that took place in 1964, many assume that the information published after 1990, is merely an additional extrapolation of previously available documentation. Therefore, for the benefit of everyone, it is necessary to separate information known before 1990, from information published after 1990, and to then ask two questions: Why did such a deluge of information suddenly became available, and is that additional information true?
The answer to both of those questions is the same.
It was misinformation intended to deceive listeners, viewers and readers, and it was let loose under the imprimatur of the British Broadcasting Corporation for the sole beneficiary of Crown censorship.
Readers who were too young to remember anything about events in 1964 tend to assume that information added after 1990, is a true representation of information available prior to that date. But such is not the case.
Of the generation who were alive and cognisant of events that took place in 1964, many assume that the information published after 1990, is merely an additional extrapolation of previously available documentation. Therefore, for the benefit of everyone, it is necessary to separate information known before 1990, from information published after 1990, and to then ask two questions: Why did such a deluge of information suddenly became available, and is that additional information true?
The answer to both of those questions is the same.
It was misinformation intended to deceive listeners, viewers and readers, and it was let loose under the imprimatur of the British Broadcasting Corporation for the sole beneficiary of Crown censorship.
The politics of geography
The methodology used for this deception was by confusing geographical terminology with political labeling, and thereby disseminating Crown propaganda. The origin of this system of misinformation began in the now defunct Kingdom of England. It was born in the year 1660 when its censorship agency that became known as the General Post Office (GPO), was also created. The idea behind the creation of the Crown Post Office was to serve as a censorship filter for all point-to-point written communications. Licensing of both the printing press and newspapers took care of unwanted commentaries harmful to Crown propaganda. Unlicensed operatives were designated as 'pirates' stealing from the Crown its prerogative of freedom of speech and expression.
The former Kingdom of England was located upon the lower half of the island known as Great Britain, but the name of the island was not synonymous with that of the kingdom. They were not interchangeable terms of reference because the upper half of the same island was occupied by the Kingdom of Scotland. Although a king from Scotland had travelled south to also become the King of England by another title, the two kingdoms were not united as one entity and both had separate Parliaments governing each kingdom.
But confusing geographical terms with political names can best be illustrated by the 1922 Crown licensing of the British Broadcasting Company Limited. That commercial cartel was composed of many British and American commercial companies doing business under the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It was a nation state which occupied the geographical archipelago known as the British Isles, and it included both the islands of Great Britain and Ireland.
In 1927, the Crown dominated nation state which had licensed the British Broadcasting Company Limited in 1922, had ceased to exist, and so did the British Broadcasting Company Limited. In that year a new nation State called the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland came into existence after the London-based Crown had lost political control over most of the island of Ireland. In 1927 it only retained control of counties to the north-east of the island.
Because of its loss of political and legal jurisdiction, the London-based Crown, which was itself known in law as a corporation sole, and not as the personal property of the reigning monarch who had become the human manifestation or representative of the Crown, then licensed a brand new entity called the British Broadcasting Corporation. In other words, the entity of 1922 did not morph into the entity of 1927. Both entities were licensed by two different nation states, even though the latter kingdom had now replaced the former kingdom in much of the same geographical area - except in the majority of the British isle called Ireland.
The former Kingdom of England was located upon the lower half of the island known as Great Britain, but the name of the island was not synonymous with that of the kingdom. They were not interchangeable terms of reference because the upper half of the same island was occupied by the Kingdom of Scotland. Although a king from Scotland had travelled south to also become the King of England by another title, the two kingdoms were not united as one entity and both had separate Parliaments governing each kingdom.
But confusing geographical terms with political names can best be illustrated by the 1922 Crown licensing of the British Broadcasting Company Limited. That commercial cartel was composed of many British and American commercial companies doing business under the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It was a nation state which occupied the geographical archipelago known as the British Isles, and it included both the islands of Great Britain and Ireland.
In 1927, the Crown dominated nation state which had licensed the British Broadcasting Company Limited in 1922, had ceased to exist, and so did the British Broadcasting Company Limited. In that year a new nation State called the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland came into existence after the London-based Crown had lost political control over most of the island of Ireland. In 1927 it only retained control of counties to the north-east of the island.
Because of its loss of political and legal jurisdiction, the London-based Crown, which was itself known in law as a corporation sole, and not as the personal property of the reigning monarch who had become the human manifestation or representative of the Crown, then licensed a brand new entity called the British Broadcasting Corporation. In other words, the entity of 1922 did not morph into the entity of 1927. Both entities were licensed by two different nation states, even though the latter kingdom had now replaced the former kingdom in much of the same geographical area - except in the majority of the British isle called Ireland.
Intertwined and Intermixed Misinformation
It is not only the intertwining and intermixing of the words politics and geography that lend to confusion, but when the words 'law and order' are added to that mix, then a deliberate obfuscation takes place because it conceals the fact that the accepted version of previous events, never happened. To enact legislation is one thing, but to enforce it is something that demands total jurisdiction of the geographical area in which laws can be enforced.
The interchanging of the terminology 'domestic legislation' with 'international law', is a misnomer. Because there is no world government there is no world police force. There are treaties between sovereign states, but there is no such thing as 'international law'. Usage of that political term implies something that does not exist.
Worse still, there is no universally agreed upon summation of past events. In each geopolitical zone on this Planet there are numerous clashing versions of previous activities that are supposed to have taken place during the same period of time within the same geographical zone. Clearly these contradictory versions which all claim to represent a true account, cannot all be true. To believe that only the victors who emerge from a bloody wars are the truth tellers is absurd, and yet, the basis of the British Crown claim is 'Might make right'.
There was a time, not so long ago, where trial by battle was the standard by which court decisions were made. Then the talking-head proxies took over to represent plaintiffs and defendants. Both sides then began the process of attempting to destroy each other with words, instead of with swords and then guns. But professional expertise of legal representation almost guarantees the acceptance or failure of the party facing the judge and jury. It is always a verdict based upon 'beyond reasonable doubt', and not beyond any doubt. Consequently many innocent people have been sent to prison or worse, to their death by order of a court.
The interchanging of the terminology 'domestic legislation' with 'international law', is a misnomer. Because there is no world government there is no world police force. There are treaties between sovereign states, but there is no such thing as 'international law'. Usage of that political term implies something that does not exist.
Worse still, there is no universally agreed upon summation of past events. In each geopolitical zone on this Planet there are numerous clashing versions of previous activities that are supposed to have taken place during the same period of time within the same geographical zone. Clearly these contradictory versions which all claim to represent a true account, cannot all be true. To believe that only the victors who emerge from a bloody wars are the truth tellers is absurd, and yet, the basis of the British Crown claim is 'Might make right'.
There was a time, not so long ago, where trial by battle was the standard by which court decisions were made. Then the talking-head proxies took over to represent plaintiffs and defendants. Both sides then began the process of attempting to destroy each other with words, instead of with swords and then guns. But professional expertise of legal representation almost guarantees the acceptance or failure of the party facing the judge and jury. It is always a verdict based upon 'beyond reasonable doubt', and not beyond any doubt. Consequently many innocent people have been sent to prison or worse, to their death by order of a court.
Ripping down the curtains
While it may be argued that some advances in technology have made bad situations even worse, there is one area in which technology has proved to be the undoing of swindlers, rapists, thugs and murderers, and that is the democratization of DNA research and availability. Coupled to that advance in the field of detection, has come digitalization and the general availability of documents once hidden to all but a few on library shelves.
This latter reference is to research that is already showing that the claims made about the past, are merely corrupt references in support of a yesterday that never happened. It has taken a long time for us to reach the point where we can now reveal that the story promoted between 1964 and today about 'Radio Caroline', is a fake.
Now it is time to reveal that the true story and the people who have concealed that truth have done so for their own benefit, because they have also propped up the fake underpinnings of the Establishment..
This latter reference is to research that is already showing that the claims made about the past, are merely corrupt references in support of a yesterday that never happened. It has taken a long time for us to reach the point where we can now reveal that the story promoted between 1964 and today about 'Radio Caroline', is a fake.
Now it is time to reveal that the true story and the people who have concealed that truth have done so for their own benefit, because they have also propped up the fake underpinnings of the Establishment..
Page 5
Editing in progress preparatory for a print edition.
This text remains fluid and subject to change.
Editing in progress preparatory for a print edition.
This text remains fluid and subject to change.
Index |
Library |
|