The problem we are looking at is a false claim by Malcolm Charles Smith who presents himself as "Peter Moore"

This does not seem to be a legal name, but a stage name.

However, while he has signed government forms as Malcolm Charles Smith, he has on at least one occasion signed his name on a government form as "Peter Moore" and then signed his name as Malcolm Smith. This presents the impression on an official UK government form that there were two people, one named "Peter Moore", and another one named Malcolm Smith.

Using his bogus identity of "Peter Moore", Malcolm Smith has created a web site in which he has made a false claim about the origins of 'Radio Caroline' in 1964. He did the same thing on BBC television.

Malcolm Smith claims to have become the owner of what is now a floating hulk known as the 'Ross Revenge'. He claims to have been awarded this vessel by a UK Admiralty Court. However, there is a court ruling in the United States that suggests that this vessel was also financed by fraud involving the same person that Malcolm Charles Smith claims as his mentor.

Malcolm Smith registered a charity in England and he has begun raising money from the general public using various fund-raising means for the vessel 'Ross Revenge' - which he claims is the home of 'Radio Caroline'. This charity also claims that it does not have a subsidiary interest in 'Radio Caroline'.

Because money is being solicited from the public using false claims about 'Radio Caroline', and then claiming that his charity is not related to his limited company trading as 'Radio Caroline',
there are many questions being raised about the possibility that UK laws continue to be violated in order to solicit money from the general public.

Then there is the question of who owns the hulk called 'Ross Revenge'?

We are aware of other groups who have encountered problems with this operation managed by Malcolm Charles Smith, and we will be interested to hear from them. In the meantime we are bringing these questions to your attention in order to clarify whether this entire operation run by Malcolm Charles Smith is a fraud.

Because we are also victims of the false propaganda published by Malcolm Charles Smith, we have a right to know what Malcolm Charles Smith is doing, and whether he is operating within the framework of UK laws.

As a follow-up to the post yesterday, the following observation has been brought to the attention of the Authority regulating Charities in England:

"I am an academic investigator and reporter examining the origins and background of a venture called 'Radio Caroline' which primarily existed from March 1964 until mid-August 1967.

The person responsible for the charity in question is going by two names. He is using his correct legal name of Malcolm Smith on your forms, but a bogus name of Peter Moore on his charity page. On the UK Companies House web site is a company that is directly tied to the charity, and the CEO of the charity has used both names to imply that they are two different people.

I paid for a book advertised on the charity page and shortly afterwards one of the three listed trustees on your site, wrote that he was refunding my payment.

It is clear that the purpose of this charity and the registered company are one and the same while pretending to be two different ventures.

Evidence shows that this charity is operating in a deceitful manner to solicit money from the public using false pretense."

If this policy is allowed to continue, then anyone filing an official document with any government operating under the laws of the United Kingdom, can state one name on the official document and then hide behind a fake identity when discussing the same matters with the public, and sometimes slip-up and use both the real and fake identities on official forms and pretend to be two different human beings.

But more than this, a UK Charity can then claim not be affiliated with another venture registered with UK Companies House, while co-mingling assets of both in order to trade with the public as a private company, and solicit funds from the public as a public charity, at the same time.

While the entity in question does not merit a public enquiry paid for by tax payers, it does merit a superior governing body taking a look at what the UK Charity commission and UK Companies House are allowing to be filed as true and honest documents. Even though there is a penalty for filing false information, if the law is not applied and applied evenly without favour, then the entire fabric of the judicial system in the United Kingdom becomes a joke.

This is the reason why we are constantly opposing the British Broadcasting Corporation from making the bogus claim that "Your BBC" is 100 years old, when in fact it is only 95 years old. To let the BBC off the hook with that kind of propaganda, and to allow the constant mis-telling of the real story about Radio Caroline (1964-1967), is to allow an Orwellian mind-set to become the gold standard where up becomes down; left becomes right for most of the time, and then sometimes the order is reversed, and sometimes both are accepted as being true.

In other words, no judge in any court of law could ever make any ruling because there would no longer exist any standard by which evidence can be admitted and ruled upon as being true, and therefore with no evidence, only anarchy can prevail.

That is why this investigation has far-reaching implications beyond trying to unravel the true story of Radio Caroline between 1964 and 1967, and the nonsense being promoted by both Paul Alexander Rusling and Malcolm Smith.

This means that we subscribe to a lot of services and we buy a lot of books. We examine the claims of others to see whether what they claim is true, or untrue. We bought a copy of the book by Paul Alexander Rusling and a lot of others who love to make bogus claims in print-on-demand books. Rusling seems to think that because he orders and pays for more than 100 books at a time, it is not print-on-his-demand.

​So here is yet another print-on-demand offer about the same related subject material:

We noticed this advertisement: https://www.rossrevenge.com/promotions/

.... and  so we bought a copy of the book ....

Then we received this a short time later:

There is no  Charity Number on the Malcolm Smith site on which he calls himself 'Peter Moore' and claims that this charity is unrelated to any other trading subsidiary. That claim is open to question because of the side connectivity to a registered company trading under the same business identity.

So is this a genuine charity or another bogus claim by a bogus person called 'Peter Moore'?

We are not amused, and hopefully neither will the relative authorities concerned.

Please use the 'YesterStories' button above to see the many and continuing editorial additions and amendments to this article.