|
Prince Charles explains 'pebble theatre'.
|
PEBBLE
|
|
Don Pierson [right] explains how a young Prince Charles made a request to join the Radio London fan club. |
|
|
This morning, the alternative UK State controlled ITV channel franchise called 'Good Morning Britain', decided that it had to get out ahead of the tidal wave of exposes that may be about to sweep parts of the so-called Free World with revelations about the origins of Covid 19. HOLY COW! - Donald Trump may have been right: The current Chinese regime is the embodiment of evil (for lack of a better word). So ITV-GMB has rebroadcast part of an Australian Sky-TV documentary. It is primarily the work of an investigative journalist who recently wrote a book:
But where did we find it and how did we find it? The fact is that we are still trying to find it, because it has been deliberately buried - just as the story behind Covid 19 has been deliberately buried. It is also amazing the former head of MI6 - the same man who set up the downfall of President Donald Trump by using the mysterious Professor Mifsud who was attached to Stirling University in Scotland - is now on the same side of the Wuhan story as Donald Trump. It is head-scratching to say the least. But on this broadcast documentary here is Trump, and here is the Head of U.S. Intelligence and the former Head of MI6, all semi-gagged by someone above them so that they cannot tell all that they know. That sounds like the current President Joe Biden who keeps telling journalists that he is not allowed to answer their questions. Just who is calling the shots? If you want the story of slavery you only have to look at Buckingham Palace for the latest in a long line of criminal thugs, now represented by a handbag carrying old women. But how could she harm anyone? Ask how the Vatican can head-up an international gang of pedophiles and you see the problem: A guy in a white dress wearing a funny hat who does not seem to be sporting a gun. How could the little old lady and the cross-dressing religious man hurt anyone? No one is to blame say the censors, and to hear that message you only need people like Garry Stevens, Paul Rusling, etc., etc., to turn the tables and point this way crying "Shame on you"! (Meaning us.) Now look again at the 1938 Nazi rallies in Germany. Look at all those girls having orgasmic experiences while waving their Swastika flags. Now look at those girls in 1964 doing the same thing in the Ed Sullivan Theatre as the Beatles come on stage. Yes, and those girls at the massive 21st Century rallies in Communist China seem to be enjoying similar experiences. Dr Joseph Mengele was one in a long line of evil people who enjoyed experiences such as drowning 'witches' and burning people to death that they disagreed with, or gained personal gratification from sexually abusing others of a younger age. A stretch to link disc jockeys playing golden oldies with lyrics asking "Have I the right to kiss you?" No, indeed no! Watch this video to see and hear Jimmy Saville introduce the Honeycombs .... While on the subject of misleading others by using some form of corrupted Biblical tract, consider this verse taken from the English Standard Version. It is found in James 3:1 - "Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness." Maybe Paul Rusling should have inserted that line into the beginning of his own text that he calls 'The Radio Caroline Bible'. However, if he had done that, and then pondered its meaning before he sent it off for print-on-demand publication, he might never have published his 'bible' in the first place!
The story of 'Jimmy Ross' has a convoluted point of origin. It began with a fictitious character called 'Paul Shaw' in a 1990 novel written by Ian Cowper Ross. In that book, the fictitious 'Paul Shaw' refers to his fictitious father simply as 'Daddy'. The fictitious 'Paul Shaw' recites that his fictitious mother who he does not name, identifies her fictitious husband by the first name of 'Jim'. In the 1990 novel, another fictitious character named 'Liam O'Mahoney' who is visiting the fictitious 'Shaw' family, addresses the fictitious 'Daddy' of the fictitious 'Paul Shaw' as 'Jimmy'. Now we move ahead one year to a 1991 BBC-TV show where the real Ian Cowper Ross appears on screen to talk both about his real life 'Daddy' (but not identified in any other way), and by inference, he associates the fictitious character named 'Liam O'Mahoney' in his 1990 novel with Ronan O'Rahilly. By inference on the 1991 BBC-TV show, the fictitious events described in the 1990 novel by Ian Cowper Ross, are then transposed to real life events and real people. In that way, 'Daddy' in the 1990 novel becomes associated with the real life father of Ian Cowper Ross, and 'Liam O'Mahoney' in the novel who calls the father of the fictitious 'Paul Shaw' by the name of 'Jimmy', is then associated with the real life Ronan O'Rahilly and therefore, again by inference, Ronan O'Rahilly supposedly addressed the real life father of Ian Cowper Ross as 'Jimmy'. Therefore, using this same bogus reasoning, the fictitious and unnamed mother of the fictitious 'Paul Shaw' who calls her fictitious husband 'Jim', is actually referring to the real life father of Ian Cowper Ross. Just one big problem with all of that: The real life father of Ian Cowper Ross is named Charles Edward Ross. He is not known as 'Jim' or 'Jimmy, even though in 2019, Paul Alexander Rusling went so far as to state on page 51 that: "While Ross senior's Christian name was Charles, many of his close friends and colleagues knew him simply as 'Jimmy'." For inspiration Rusling turned to the work of Ray Clark who published a book in 2014 about Radio Caroline for which he interviewed Ian Cowper Ross, and on Clark's page 38, he quoted Ian Cowper Ross talking about Ronan O'Rahilly: "He (O'Rahilly) sat there and gave the spiel to 'old Jimmy'. I can't believe that he would call my dad Jimmy; the whole idea of it was unbelievable ... 'Jasus Jimmy, you won't believe it when you see this' ...." With the creation of this fictitious character referred to as 'Jim' and 'Jimmy' that leaped from a 1990 novel onto a 1991 BBC-TV show, and then into a 2014 book by Ray Clark, to a 2019 book by Paul Rusling, the words of Ian Cowper Ross which speak of 'Jimmy', and which are placed into the mouth of Ronan O'Rahilly, are never actually connected by Ian Cowper Ross to claiming that 'Jim Shaw' or 'Jimmy Shaw', is Jimmy Ross. Ian Cowper Ross lets viewers and readers connect those dots. What Ian Cowper Ross says is that "I can't believe that he (Ronan O'Rahilly) would call my dad Jimmy; the whole idea of it was unbelievable ...." That's just it. It was "unbelievable" because it is simply not true! But now Wikipedia is reporting that a 'Jimmy Ross' was the head of MacFisheries, CarPhone Warhouse and all manner of different companies, all without any proof whatsoever, and neither could there be, because 'Jimmy Ross' is not the 'Daddy' of Ian Cowper Ross, and neither did Ian Cowper Ross actually say that he is! Just how devious Ian Cowper Ross has become over the years is becoming apparent, because he has certainly helped to cause the self-deception of a lot of people who have tried to fathom the origins of Radio Caroline. Now part of this has been possible because trying to nail down the hard facts about the life and times of Charles Edward Ross is very difficult, and there is obviously a reason why Charles Edward Ross did not want anyone to know who he really is. How much Ian Cowper Ross knows about his real father is another matter again. But the deception begins in 1964 with the first Press Release that was issued by Leslie Perrin and Associates, and its author appears to be David Block who was working for Perrin.  The true story was never intended to be read by anyone, and the nearest thing to a nod in the direction of the true story that was published in the press, was the emergence during early 1964 of Jocelyn Stevens. It was in a Granada television program shown during early 1964, and filmed in Stevens' Fetter Lane office. Seated in a corner on one side of his desk, Stevens gathered around him a very shy and young Ian Cowper Ross, whilen another corner next to Stevens' desk sat a very nervous and young Ronan O'Rahilly. A very ill-at-ease Christopher Moore sat against another wall facing sideways in front of Stevens' desk while smoking a cigarette and portraying a look that he wished he was not there.  Jocelyn Stevens was forced into the limelight because Ronan O'Rahilly was not yet up to the job of answering press questions about who was behind Radio Caroline. Planet Sales was not a company, it was not based at Fetter Lane, and consequently Stevens and O'Rahilly could not be 'joint managing directors' of something that did not exist.
During this period of time Leslie Perrin and Associates were employed to front various spokespeople who all claimed to represent Radio Caroline. But when all else failed, Jocelyn Stevens had to step forward. Stevens had been involved since the very beginning and that takes us back in time to at least the year 1960!  Click the montage to hear a sample song from Charles Cowper Ross' awful musical!
 The British Broadcasting Corporation transmits a constant stream of rubbish to the world, and yesterday they were at it again with another 40 minutes about a station they called 'Radio Caroline', except that it wasn't. This is the reason why we are drawing a line under August 14, 1967 when the original and real Radio Caroline died - forever.
But what the BBC is doing is promoting this totally false narrative that a station called 'Radio Caroline' is still on the air - now with a UK broadcasting licence. This is the fake history that is being taught to students today, and it is that same mythology that the BBC is once again endorsing and broadcasting to the general public. Why are we so concerned? Because BBC programs such as this one, have been built upon deception under the pretense of actuality, and that is the main fare of the authorized story about the past that is constantly promoted by the UK Establishment. This BBC program is typical of a form of presentation about the past that was 'perfected' in WWII using a mandate by Winston Churchill, but placed under the direction of Sefton Delmer. This new program follows Sefton Delmer's style of presentation: It contains a certain amount of true reporting about the sinking of the Mi Amigo in 1980, but it mixed-it with a totally fictitious story about broadcasting after August 14, 1967 by a station using the name of 'Radio Caroline'. This only reinforces the falsehood that back in 1964, Ronan O'Rahilly was the originator of the authentic station called Radio Caroline. He was not, and neither is there any continuity that is alleged to stretch from Radio Caroline of 1964-1967, to the event that Nick Richards is now relating on the BBC World Service. Until 2015 we thought that the true story about the origins of Radio Caroline was known. We had already begun to publish our work with a precursory introduction under a two-part title called 'UK Offshore Radio' (which is still available Online.) Then the fog of confusion descended and everything ground to a halt.
As we have previously revealed in our two Blogs, as well as in an article published in the magazine of the Communications Museum at Burntisland in Scotland, we were confronted with a conundrum. That mystery began with a book called 'Radio Man'. The initial problem began when the authors of 'Radio Man' claimed a very different heritage to the existing and accepted story, because their version was at variance with the one stated in books; magazine articles; newspaper features and broadcasts. It took us over two years to root out the true story, and one reason for the delay is that the person who had commissioned the publication of 'Radio Man' had spent almost £100,000 in the process. The net effect was to deceive by obfuscation, and therefore mislead readers. While the story in 'Radio Man' is at variance with the 'pop' version, its harm is compounded by the careful substitution of words used in print, in order to change the meaning of the original research text prior to publication. We do not believe that this was an accident. We eventually discovered that the twisting of facts to partially deceive, was nothing more than a process put into play by Winston Churchill during World War II. This Churchillian strategy was deliberately invented to confuse and misinform the Nazi German leaders. It even confused President Roosevelt who was not told at first about the Churchillian plan of intentional deception. So the USA began to spend money and manpower to investigate what was perceived to be information coming from Nazi Germany, when it was really coming from Churchill's autocratic and secretive United Kingdom. But by the Nineteen Sixties, that same methodology was being employed by British entrepreneurs to deceive the British electorate. Back in WWII it wasn't just one group of men and women who were engaged in a single operation, and nor was it simply passive propaganda. In WWII this was an operation outside the realm of standard warfare. Winston Churchill commissioned several bodies on a 'need-to-know' basis to engage in an over-arching plan of action. In some instances its operatives acted like terrorists. Some were pornographers; some were engaged in polemics wrapped around religion, and others in musical entertainment to attract potential victims. Back in WWII it all fell under the umbrella of the UK Official Secrets Act, and while the true story has been dribbling out since the end of WWII, not all of it is known to this day. But decades later, it was not as if just the same WWII methodology had been employed to conceal the real story of offshore radio, because in some instances the very same people had been recruited - because of their wartime know-how. That is what we ran into when trying to research this story. Most of the offshore radio fans did not, and still do not, have a clue. Don Pierson, the Texan who created Radio London, Britain Radio and Radio England, was also deceived. He reacted to the fantasy and not to the facts, and it led to his downfall with regards to his financial involvement in those stations. In the instances of Britain Radio and Radio England, it also led to those stations becoming financial disasters. So we are now getting ready to begin a new series of part-publications, and each one will consist of a two-sided approach. One section will debunk the myths, while another one will spell out the real story. After several of these part-publications have been released, they will then be edited to conform to a single volume, with more part-publications to follow. They will likewise be grouped together as another volume that will eventually become a continuing series of volumes, as we originally promised prior to 2015. In this way, if we need to correct any part of a part-volume with additions or deletions or amendments, we can do so relatively quickly and at low cost. We will keep you informed as to our publishing progress. In the 1960s, while Marshall McLuhan was busy explaining to Canadian students why "the medium is the message", in England, it was Beatrix Miller who was inventing a fantasy message about a girl named Caroline. By the 1980s, it was Tanith Lee who aptly but coincidentally extrapolated a true picture of that phantasmic girl: "The final shreds of her identity and her role seemed to discard her. She was left, a pebble spun through chaos, no firm ground anywhere for sanity to take a stand."* Back in 1965, investigators for the UK Board of Trade were coming to the conclusion that no matter how diligent they were, they would never find the parents of Caroline, because her parents did not exist. Caroline was an audible illusion. She was merely a false perception of a real sound that had been intentionally stimulated in the minds of listeners to deceive them: Caroline is the girl who never was. *Lee, Tanith. Day by Night. ISBN 10: 0879975768 Due to the amount of material already published on this Blog, and on our companion Blog, we are in the process of merging both timelines and placing our previously published research work into the order in which it should appear. As soon as this process is completed we will begin adding newly researched information. This will enable us to speed-up the first print date for our continuing part work and make it available before the end of this year.
It was if by magic that the renamed mv Fredericia suddenly appeared off Harwich on March 27, 1964, and when everyone looked, they found that it had departed from a dock at Greenore in the Republic of Ireland. So who paid for that ship, and who took it to Rotterdam where it stayed for some time? Who put those imported Texas transmitters on board, and after a lengthy stay in Holland, who paid for the ship to be taken to Greenore? The answer from the mountains of books and articles and newspaper reports is "Don't know". But we do! Here is a skeleton outline of our timetable about the mv Fredericia which is currently being assembled. It does not begin in 1963, but that is where this short version commences.
 This timeline will be expanded with additional material, much of which has already been published on this Blog as original research, but not in a universal timeline. Our existing timeline page will be gradually revised to include this content.
More tomorrow! In the eponymous year of 1964 when Radio Caroline began to broadcast, Canadian professor Marshall McLuhan became the author of Understanding media: the extensions of man. From this book emerged that now well-known phrase: “the medium is the message”. It has been interpreted in many ways, and one of them would fit the description of radio anoraks who seem to worship old hulks, jingles and the lives of aging disc jockeys, rather than program content. While we are trying to discover the true origins of Radio Caroline, radio anoraks are the disciples of fantasy, and so our investigation is at variance with their own quasi-religious beliefs. Somehow they believe that the message broadcast is not as important as the location of the transmitter that radiated that message. From this strange interpretation has emerged a reinterpretation of the words 'free radio'. To radio anoraks it does not mean the promotion of freedom of expression, but it often means the embracing of any corrupt political system that allows these anoraks to radiate poisonous diatribe into the ether. Consequently, many radio anoraks put themselves in the same boat (pardon the pun), as the most extreme fanatical religious cultist, and no matter what we reveal, these cultists miss its actual message and seize upon a typo as the object of our publication. Crazy is too soft a word to describe these idiots, which is why we are adding the words of Marshall McLuhan to this Blog so that he can explain in his own words exactly what he meant. Here is Part Three .... Sefton Delmer's programming was considered to be so outrageous that the British Broadcasting Corporation wanted nothing to do with it, and so WWII Prime Minister Winston Churchill gave him his own 'Alternative BBC'. It went under dozens of names because Selfton Delmer had dozens of stations, all aimed at deceit and mind-manipulation.
But Sefton Delmer was not alone. There were many other secretive organizations that were inspired by the mind of Winston Churchill. Now remember, Winston Churchill had been personally responsible (back in 1920), as the local Member of Parliament for Dundee in Scotland, who promoted what has become a 2021 cult classic of mythology called 'The Illuminati'. Winston Churchill was very politically and culturally un-correct by today's standards, because he was a quasi-Anti-Semite who came up with the idea of "Good Jew" and "Bad Jew". Churchill claimed that British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli was a "Good Jew" - because he had renounced Judaism by switching to English Christian Protestantism which had a British King (today a Queen), in charge of that organization called the 'Church of England'. Churchill's "Bad Jews" were the international Jews who had overthrown the Russian monarchy and created the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) in order to promote communism. Churchill was born to an English father and an American mother, but his political ambitions lay with himself and his manipulation of the British Crown. This he interpreted to mean that as WWII Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, he had to undermine its Crown corporation sole so that in turn, he could then undermine the government of the United States of America. Why? So that Churchill could bring the USA into the War on the British side. This Churchill did with great success! But Selfton Delmer was not alone in the compartmentalized world of Winston Churchill's devious plans for propaganda. Because along with his proto-terrorist SOE charged with "setting Europe ablaze", he also had a Committee whose job it was to deceive the Nazi empire of Adolph Hitler about the location of D-Day. This job was tasked to a man who became a very famous British novelist, and he in turn worked on this Committee with another man whose job it was to take that fake information to UK Ambassadors overseas. After all, Churchill did not want his own stooges to deceive his own representatives into trying to negate the false propaganda that was intended to deceive Hitler about the real D-Day invasion plans. That agent from 1944 who took this fake warning to British government officials overseas, was the same man who worked to create the fake world of 'Jimmy' in 1964. The same kind of fake stories that anoraks have fallen for, was part of a plan to deceive and mislead, just like the Nazis fell for the fake story of D-Day. Yes, the fake story behind Radio Caroline came from the same kind of people who had been tasked with deceiving Adolph Hitler, and the young and impressionable anoraks of today have probably only a foggy notion about who Adolph Hitler was, and what he did. So anoraks, you were, and apparently you still are, push-overs ready to believe any old rubbish thrown your way. While you may be devious, your brains are mush compared with the intricate ambitions of a man like Winston Churchill. That is why you need to be told about the real game-plan behind Radio Caroline, but the question is this: Are anoraks minds so welded-shut to receiving the expose we are bringing to you - free of charge? The anorak propagandists behind your mind-manipulation make you pay financially for rubbish, and then their con men make you work for them free of charge as a 'labor of love'. Not only is it not loving, but it is not awareness either. However, it does appear that there really is a "sucker born every minute". Dig deep suckers, a present-day junior deceiver wants you to pay for a new engine to be installed on his hulk, and to also pay for the rising cost of electricity to power-up his fraudulent operation called 'Radio Caroline'. Better that you watch and listen again to the attached video and begin to actually wonder if you have been led to believe the bunch of hogwash which claims that "Caroline continues" - when in fact - Radio Caroline has been dead since August 14, 1967.  Beginning in the year 1964, 'Jimmy' became the elephant in the room, and no one ever saw him because 'Jimmy' did not exist. Yet, everyone has been led to believe that he did! But one man has been present all along and his presence in this story dates back before the Pilkington Committee first sat down to discuss the possibility of licensing commercial radio in the United Kingdom. That man is Jocelyn Stevens. Look for 'Jimmy' in this story and you won't find him. But look for Jocelyn Stevens and all of a sudden, a hidden story begins to emerge! He is even there in 1960, which is when Alfred Nicholas Thomas retired from the BBC and went to work for a company within the Pye Group. Jocelyn Stevens was there in 1960 when Pye began limited broadcasting via a power-line transmission system under the name of CBC Radio Cambridge! But if you follow the now well published stories about 'Jimmy' and Radio Caroline in 1964, you will be asked to believe in a phantom who, like 'Radio Caroline' as a company, never existed! Back in 1964 Jocelyn Stevens knew the truth. He had been involved with various strands of interest in commercial broadcasting when they began to come together in order to put 'Radio Caroline' on the air. That was long before Ian Cowper Ross began to laugh at your expense in 1991 on BBC-TV with Jocelyn Stevens gladly participating. Because back in 1964, Jocelyn Stevens had done the same thing on Granada TV - with a very young and sheepish Ian Cowper Ross in the same room and just watching Jocelyn at play .... Jocelyn Stevens was not "Mister Big" - but he knew who was, and Jocelyn Stevens was involved from the very beginning of the steps that led up to the creation of Radio Caroline. He assisted with the coordinating process of bringing together many different interests, and he was responsible for pushing Ronan O'Rahilly in front of the media as spokesman, and bringing in Ian Cowper Ross to write additional misleading material to misdirect the attention of the press and the government.
 Please visit this site for the full story behind the fake D-Day confidence trick to deceive Adolph Hitler. Here is an excerpt ....  While General George Patton acted out the storyline that was written for him, he was not the author of the plan.
That credit belonged to a very famous author (shown above), who worked on a highly secret committee that was part of a complex plan incorporating the activities at Bletchley, where the decoded information gained from the Nazi 'Enigma' machine, enabled the Allies to respond to the secret commands that the Germans were giving to their own military forces. This highly secret information was used in a variety of ways by Allied secret operatives. They included the SOE or Special Operations Executive, whose activities today might be classified as terrorism, and the Special Air Service known by the initials of SAS. There was also a massive and highly secret broadcasting operation that the BBC wanted nothing to do with. At its head was a man named Sefton Delmer and he created a huge clandestine broadcasting organization around a series of transmitters with the code name of 'Aspid'. The most powerful of these transmitters had been built in the USA for a station that never used it. After being bought from RCA, it was then shipped to England where it was nicknamed 'Astpidistra'. The name supposedly came from the Gracie Fields' recording which was actually called 'Aspidastra'. (We have previously covered that part of this story.) Winston Churchill supervised all of these activities and most of them were, and some of still are, classified as highly secret. Churchill saw WWII as a total war to the finish, and he had set his jaw upon using any method whatsoever to defeat and destroy Nazi Germany. Some in his Cabinet became aghast and horrified by what they learned, and at least one high level person went so far as to say that he would rather lose the War than use such methods. But Churchill okayed them anyway, and their various operational directors received the go-ahead to use whatever imaginative ideas came into their heads. There was only one goal, and that was to utterly wipe-out and thus totally destroy Adolph Hitler's expansive plans to conquer and occupy other countries. After the War the people behind all of this Allied skullduggery which originated in London, went about their civilian lives. But they were armed with a knowledge that anyone living according to the known and stated objectives of civilized life would find horrific - if those tactics were to be applied domestically in peacetime. But some found it difficult to turn off that knowledge, and at least one of them who had worked alongside the author of the fake D-Day plans of deception, became heavily involved during start-up period of Radio Caroline. This is where the much more impressive role of General George Patton meets the life and times of Ronan O'Rahilly. It is how Patton's scriptwriter influenced the deceptive work of a very young Ian Cowper Ross who was tasked with aiding O'Rahilly into creating the fake story behind the start-up of Radio Caroline. But then Ian Cowper Ross was just a kid back in 1964, and someone else was pulling his strings! More tomorrow ....  On page 535 of Mike Leonard's massive encyclopedia about offshore broadcasting that he published in the year 1996, there is an addendum to the big lie that first appeared in the storyline of a novel written by Ian Cowper Ross in 1990. Mike Leonard does not promote that lie, he reports what he has learned about plans for the BBC to promote that lie!
The BBC were entertaining plans for a 4-part television series about a family called 'Shaw', and the main storyteller in the novel and therefore on the screen, would be a character called 'Paul Shaw'. Who would play the part of 'Paul Shaw' we do not know - unless the BBC in 1994, were about to let Ian Cowper Ross expand upon his fake interpretation of his 1990 novel which he did on BBC-TV in a 1991 documentary, so that Ian Cowper Ross acted out the part of 'Paul Shaw'. But we don't know what would have happened because the 4-part series was never made. In his 1990 novel, the character called 'Paul Shaw' has a father named 'Jim Shaw', who another fictitious character named 'Liam O'Mahoney' addresses as 'Jimmy'. Not 'Jimmy Shaw', just 'Jimmy', even though his fictitious son named 'Paul Shaw' says that his father's proper name is 'Jim', not 'James', just 'Jim'. But then, it is all fiction. One year later in 1991, on BBC-TV, the same Ian Cowper Ross tells the audience that the 'Jimmy' is how Ronan O'Rahilly addressed his real father who is named Charles Edward Ross, and that the car ride described in his novel about the fictitious 'Paul Shaw', and the correspondingly fictitious meeting of 'Liam O'Mahoney' with 'Jim Shaw', is a true account of an event that did take place. That is because, claimed Ian Cowper Ross in 1991, 'Liam O'Mahoney' is really Ronan O'Rahilly and 'Jim Shaw' who 'Liam O'Mahoney' calls 'Jimmy', is really Charles Edward Ross. To get around the complexity of telling all that to a television audience, Ian Cowper Ross, who keeps touching his nose on the 1991 BBC-TV documenary in the way that someone who is 'only kidding' does, never made that direct link. What Ian Cowper Ross did was to keep referring to his father Charles Edward Ross as "Daddy". Ian Cowper Ross continues to use this approach in telling his tale to this very day. He calls his father "Daddy" and he says that Ronan O'Rahilly called his father "Jimmy", and not only that, O'Rahilly did this on his very first introductory meeting in the real home of Ian Cowper Ross. The year was .... ? To this day, no one has ever published a picture of Charles Edward Ross, or even specifically stated where Charles Edward Ross worked, or even named the exact date upon which this meeting took place! Yet, according to Paul Rusling; Ray Clark, and a whole bevy of hack writers, without that first meeting between Ronan O'Rahilly and Charles Edward Ross in 1964, a station calling itself Radio Caroline would never have come on the air! So according to this fake version of events 'Jimmy Shaw' is the real "Mister Big" behind Radio Caroline - except that this fake story is simply a fake story. It is a lie! But if all the rest is a twisting of the truth, so is the legal and corporate structure of Radio Caroline as an entity in 1964, because in 1964 no company registered in the UK as 'Radio Caroline Limited'. However, at the close of 1963 a ship had been bought and then equipped with American transmitters and studio equipment. So where did the money come from and how were these purchases made and who authorized them? In other words: who was the real 'Mister Big'? Those purchases took place long before a sales company was registered in Ireland on February 25, 1964 called Planet Productions Limited. It took quite a bit of time and some expenditure by us working with a partner, to get the Irish government to release the filed archive copies of all of the documents relating to the Planet Productions Limited company. We have known now for some time who applied for the initial registration of Planet Productions Limited and when they did it. We also know who took that company over, and who its directors and shareholders were. One of its shareholders is the same person who Winston Churchill used a part of a multi-faceted secret operation to defeat Nazi Germany. His job was to assist another member of a special committee to write and promote the totally fictitious alternative plans for D-Day involving General George Patten. More tomorrow! The other night a program called 9/11: Life Under Attack aired on television about the events on September 11, 2001. It presented a "narrative driven exclusively by audio and footage from the day, without any interviews".... and painted ".... a vivid portrait of events as they unfolded with new, compelling and profoundly moving accounts."
That set this program apart from others, because the commentators who often double-up to act as interpreters, were not present. The viewer and listener was transported back in time to see and hear what others saw and heard at the time. It was a very informative, enthralling, and a moving experience while at the same time being very educational. This process of time transportation is now possible due to digitalization and the World Wide Web via WiFi Internet connections. They have made possible, a total re-immersion in subjects covering the Twentieth Century - due to the preservation and restoration of recorded sound and print as it came into extensive usage. "Historians" are those who tell us what to see and what to hear, and how to interpret what we see and hear. But now you can see and hear the evidence from the past for yourself. Tomorrow we will return to the theme established yesterday when we again peel back the pages of time to learn what was behind the motivation for Ian Cowper Ross to begin rewriting a history about offshore radio, and his explanation is in sharp contrast with reality. Unfortunately, the lazy approach by many causes the masses to parrot what others have told them, because they do not, and will not, research matters for themselves. When someone does look into the past using all of the modern-day means to research archive material, what they learn is not what the "historians" have told them, but something quite different. So we invite you to see and hear what we have learned and to check out the facts for yourself. Don't take our word for it, but please, don't steal our research, or engage in the foolish game of trying to turn a typo into a factual contradiction of reality, which is what the world of the anoraks have been, and are continuing to do. We are presenting this information free of charge on our Blogs as a public service in the public interest, but our time and our expense also makes it a work that qualifies for protection under universal copyright laws. How many people who claim to be interested in offshore radio have spent the money and the time to obtain the original founding documents, and then conducted research into the links that are provided in those documents?
We know of no one other than our Trio. Oh, people have gathered news cuttings, but Paul Harris did that back in the Sixties to disastrous results. He got everything wrong, except perhaps the original documents that perhaps he saw which related to RNI and the Stasi. But we know what became of that trail: absolutely nothing. We were given the founding documents behind Radio London; Radio England and Britain Radio long ago, and we have followed those leads. But unfortunately for Don Pierson, the founder of those stations, he was deliberately mislead by a professional team of liars, cheats and con men. No, we don't mean Ronan O'Rahilly, he was merely a paid stooge and Ian Cowper Ross was his helper. Tomorrow we will uncover some of the mess behind the 1990 saga of Ian Cowper Ross, and guess what? Parts of that story were actually uncovered way back in 1996 by Mike Leonard - before he got sloppy and merely repeated what others were saying and writing. If we had known that we were actually trying to unmask the work of some of the very same people who deceived the Germans where the D-Day landings would take place, our underfinanced Trio would probably have never begun this 'Caroline Investigation'.
We had been given, long ago, the financial and legal files of Don Pierson who put Radio London, Radio England and Britain Radio on the air, and so we knew that he had been misled into reacting to both the British Crown and the smokescreen of deception that Ronan O'Rahilly had blown over the news media. Therefore we are now carefully examining all of the hard and documented evidence very carefully and refraining from making new assumptions. We are using our E+O3X code to unmask the rubbish that is out there, and we are now totally ignoring anything arising from the so-called anorak community, because we do not have the money or the time to respond to their childish rubbish. We had hoped to arrange a cooperating symposium with others who have previously been of great help, but the anoraks on the fringe have made that impossible, especially after Paul Rusling decided to engage in outright intellectual theft of our self-funded research work. Making matters worse, because he did not understand this subject, he then took our genuine research and coupled it to his own distorted nonsense. We will keep our readers informed of progress, but if you really want to know more about our plans to turn these Blogs into print, and add the biographical version mentioned previously, then please get in touch via the email address found under 'YesterLinks' on this Blog. Our ongoing research has just uncovered some new information, and just as one answer often leads to another question, the same is true with this raw data. We will keep our readers informed above how this hitherto unassimilated material both expands and modifies existing information about Radio Caroline during the years from 1964-1967. It has now become available thanks to digitalization and third-stage connectivity.
Without a working hypothesis that hitherto unrecognized data may still exist to link the first-stage to the third stage, this second stage would never have been uncovered and become available for factoring into the timeline. Its relevance is that it fills-in gaps that have allowed others to gloss-over with made-up fiction concerning the actual start-month of Radio Caroline as a spin-off project from Radio Atlanta. Right now we are working on placing this data in context to provide more of the true story about the creation and short life of Radio Caroline from 1964 to 1967 as an offshore station. On this Blog today, we were going to refer to the part played (quite by chance), by Oonagh Leigh, when she added her own element to an to authentic timeline of events that related to the use of 6 Chesterfield Gardens in London, by entities sheltering under the umbrella name of 'Radio Caroline'. However, on our companion Blog today, we were forced to draw attention to the current plans of Paul Rusling - because right now he may be in the process of attempting another theft of our self-funded research. Therefore, we have decided to temporarily sit back and see what Rusling does next. In the meantime, we will now work upon assembling an edited version of the content already published Online in our twin blogs, and then publish them in print in as many volumes as necessary. To this we will also add a biographical account drawn from the lives of our Trio, and we will relate those lives to the same material. But, we will do so with added personal details, because of the close first-person contact that our Trio had with many of those involved in this story. Another reason for taking this step is to be found on this Blog dated August 4, 2020. That is where we dealt with the story behind Paul Rusling's original theft, although we left out many details which we will now reinsert into the actual story. In that edition dated August 4, 2020, we explained how an Admin (Dave Martin) on the 'Free Radio Forum' posted on September 19, 2019, the following comment about Rusling's 'bible'. It reads: "It is endorsed by many, including Mervyn Hagger, Gary Stevens and Hans Knot." That was before Rusling actually began selling his book. Paul Rusling then responded on October 30, 2019 by claiming that: ".... The Radio Caroline Bible is nothing to do with Mervyn Hagger." But that statement by Rusling contradicted his own advance sales flyer dated September 21, 2019.  The denial by Rusling was followed by this post: "I thought Paul there was a mention of Hagger within the acknowledgements - that has now vanished/censored??? Yes or No??" That question was followed by this answer: "Posted by Dave Martin on 1/11/2019 .... Freddie look here https://mb.boardhost.com/FreeRadioForum/msg/1569052225.html" (A reference to 'Free Radio Forum' .)  In turn, Freddie Archer who is really Bob Meade replied: "Thanks Dave, I thought I did not dream it up. If Paul has erased ALL of Hagger's nonsense (including his name) from his book, he can come here and say so and welcome, silence is not an option though, nor is denial." We demanded that this acknowledgement (shown above), which served as a form of endorsement, be amended by removing any reference to Mervyn Hagger. Not only is Rusling's book based upon theft of intellectual research which was paid for by us, but his entire book is a twisted diatribe in support of a myth created and promoted by Ian Cowper Ross, as well as the undeserved adoration of Ronan O'Rahilly who was NOT the creator of 'Radio Caroline'! Rusling complied with our demand and the reference disappeared. Rusling's twin excuse was that a) it was not an endorsement, and b) Hans Knot was to blame for creating this text as a means of promoting the sale of Rusling's book.  Now Bob Meade aka Freddie Archer, is one the most self-righteous, opinionated, waste of space that has ever been given birth to on this Planet.
Why anyone should give a flying hoot about anything this guy says? But he demands answers, and the world should answer to him, or else! Paul Rusling and Bob Meade are typical of the people who call themselves 'anoraks'. They claim to know everything and yet they know nothing. They do no work in research, but demand that others do it for them - to their specifications - or suffer for failure to do so. What a jerk this guy is. In short, Bob Meade is a classic example of why this world in the West has descended into the squawking noise-box of nothingness that it is now residing in. But Bob Meade does not stop there! He puts his self-righteous stupidity into print - albeit under the name of 'Freddie Archer', and this is what he also wrote on November 1, 2019: "I hope his (Mervyn's) book, if it ever sees the light of day, is a huge flop. To pick on someone who cannot defend themselves, is vileness of the first order. But Hagger, seems to have no normal human feelings at all. Just complete and utter selfishness." Bob Meade was referring to our unmasking of the lies spun by Ronan O'Rahilly and his ilk. In Meade's mind the name Ronan O'Rahilly approaches that of a saint in a pseudo 'Church of Caroline'. Meade's thinking seems to be that if someone is unable to respond because they are incapacitated or even dead, then the adage "don't speak badly about them" seems to apply to Ronan O'Rahilly. Therefore to Bob Meade, denouncing Heinrich Himmler who set the gas ovens of WWII in overdrive, would be a crime in itself. Okay, not Heinrich Himmler? No? How about his boss Adolph Hitler? No? How about Al Capone? No? How about Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew? (Rusling told us that he wanted someone with a nasty reputation like Epstein who had money to go into business with him on his 'Party Boat' venture. Rusling thought that his version of nastiness was just a misunderstood person.) Not Epstein or Andrew? Then how about a nameless young thug who beats up old ladies for their money? No? Well then, who? Oh, that's right - anyone who tells the truth and stands up for what is right and denounces what is wrong with world of the anoraks, and never asks YOU for money. How about when we denounce people like Ronan O'Rahilly and lessor beings like Paul Rusling? Given that we are now dealing with such amoral people from the gutter, we will stop what we are doing and see what this gutter press of Rusling is about to do. (For details of his announced plans please visit our companion Blog.) Meantime, we will now keep you informed about our own print schedule while taking a closer look at the possibility that more theft is about to be committed by Paul Rusling. But in the meantime we will mitigate the additional harm that may come our way by halting this version of our operation on both blogs. By the way: Our research is continuing, and now our pre-print editing work has begun. As a result of this change in strategy, we will be adding a change to our contact links, For general comments please continue to visit 'Conversation Central'. But if you would like to be kept privately informed about our research and publishing timetable, there will be an additional link for you to add your details. This change will come into effect within the next 24 hours. (Anoraks are not welcome.) In his 2019 plagiarized work (from us) called 'The Radio Caroline bible', Paul Rusling twisted our documented facts to support his undocumented fiction. But, by introducing a character into his work of fiction called 'Oonagh Huggard', he opened the door to us to explain to our readers who this person wasn't, and who the real person behind that name really is! As we told you in yesterday's Blog, the fictitious version of the Radio Caroline story is now being taken apart on our companion Blog - see the link above - but the story of Oonagh straddles both fences, and here is the reason why: While 'Oonagh Huggard' as referenced by Rusling does not exist, his other identification of this person as Oonagh Karanjia most certainly does exist.  It is a variation of the story about 'Jim Shaw' who has been transported into the real life of Charles Edward Ross, and the people performing that transition include the person of Paul Rusling in his fraudulent work called 'The Radio Caroline bible'.
So while we will explain on our companion Blog how Rusling's fictitious character that he calls 'Oonagh Huggard' ties into that nonsense story originally dreamed-up by Ian Cowper Ross in 1990, and then blown-up into a totally misleading and fictitious story by him in 1991 on BBC-TV; and after that compounded into more distortions of the truth by Ray Clark in 2003 within the first publication of his book (which he reissued in 2019), all of that rubbish provided a foundation for Rusling 's nonsense that he published in 2019. But we can also reveal on this Blog, the true details about the life of Oonagh Karanjia. In fact, there is a lot of information in the Rusling book that came directly from us, but which he did not understand. This includes his reference to our hypothesis which we revealed to him about the transmitters that were loaded on to the mv Fredericia. They had been delivered from Dallas to Rotterdam, via a stop in the Bahamas, after being transported there by the mv Mi Amigo. You won't find that information anywhere else because it came from us, as a hypothesis. It was as far as we could tell, the only logical explanation. But in formulating that hypothesis we had to know that the Mi Amigo stopped in the Bahamas, and we knew that because that is what we learned from our first-hand sources in Houston back in the Nineteen Seventies. Rusling falls into a trap of his own making. On the one hand he supports the Ian Cowper Ross mythology about a man named 'Jim Shaw' who was introduced in a 1990 novel by Ian Cowper Ross, but then twisted again by Ian Cowper Ross in 1991 on BBC-TV, where 'Jim Shaw' is referred to as "Daddy" - by Ian Cowper Ross. Note, Ian Cowper Ross never explicitly says that 'Jim Shaw' is another name for his "Daddy". The crazy anoraks have done that by jumping to conclusions. Of course, that was the intention of Ian Cowper Ross, but Ian Cowper Ross did not state that as a fact, either in print, or on television. Then along came Rusling who swallowed the bait, hook, line and sinker so that 'Jim Shaw' became 'Jimmy Ross', although Ian Cowper Ross never explicitly said that 'Jim Shaw' was his "Daddy". But then he wouldn't, would he? (To borrow that infamous line by Mandy Rice-Davies who will also feature in future editions of our blogs.) What Ian Cowper Ross wrote in his 1990 novel was a story about a person called 'Paul Shaw' and another character called 'Liam O'Mahoney', and a ship called 'mv Anastassia' - which is also a non-existing vessel. In that 1990 novel, it is 'Liam O'Mahoney' who calls 'Jim Shaw' by the name 'Jimmy'. So along comes Rusling and makes an absolute statement that it is the friends of Charles Edward Ross (who is the real father of Ian Cowper Ross), who begin to call Charles Edward Ross by the name of "Jimmy". Not only is it illogical, it is also without any foundation in any form of documented fact. Rusling just made it up to con his readers into thinking that he had some sort of 'inside' gossip. Well, he didn't. Rusling lied. Now the reason for us introducing this background information on this Blog, after telling our readers that we would split fact from fiction on our two blogs, is because Rusling used the character of 'Oonagh Huggard' (who also does not exist) in order to also identify 'her' as Oonagh Karanjia (who does exist). Yes, that is a complicated bit of mumbo-jumbo, but that is what happens when fiction is palmed off as fact, and in this instance, the person doing the faking is Paul Rusling. We won't go further into that detailed work of fiction here, but we do want to refer to the person of Oonagh Karanjia, because under her maiden name as Oonagh Leigh, and her later name by marriage as Oonagh Hubbard (not Oonagh Huggard), before she became Oonagh Karanjia; this person left 'crumbs' of documented evidence along the way to living her life. Those 'crumbs' are cemented into contemporary documentation that cannot be tampered with, and they support our factual storyline. They are what they are, and we have discovered them, and Rusling does not know of them! The reason why they are now important is because they add to the real timeline of events concerning Radio Caroline. The key dates that we already published, are these:
We will reveal on our companion Blog how the bogus story told by Paul Rusling relates to both Ian Cowper Ross and Jocelyn Stevens, as well as 'Oonagh Huggard' and 6 Chesterfield Gardens. But on this Blog we will relate how the real Oonagh Leigh provides an added detail about the actual move to 6 Chesterfield Gardens by ventures connected to Radio Caroline. As the UK Board of Trade confirmed by its own investigation during 1965, there was no such company as 'Radio Caroline Limited', but they did want to know who was trading at 6 Chesterfield Gardens in the name of 'Radio Caroline'. In previous blogs we have explained how Harry Meadows who owned both 'Churchills' and '21 Club', appears to have come to own not only 8 Chesterfield Gardens, which was the home of the '21 Club', but his announced plans for a hotel strongly suggest that he also owned number 7 and number 6 Chesterfield Gardens as well. That was before anyone associated with Radio Caroline as a project moved in. Now we do have documented dates for Harry Meadows taking over 8 Chesterfield Gardens, and his announced plans for a 'Meadows Hotel' that would occupy the buildings 8, 7 and 6 Chesterfield Gardens. We also have the first documented and authentic public notice in the press regarding Oonagh Leigh that is to be found in a classified advertisement for a fan club that she was operating on behalf of a music group called 'The Temperance Seven'. Ironically, in his book, Rusling confirms the home address used by Oonagh Leigh in context with her meeting Ronan O'Rahilly. It is at the same address that Oonagh Leigh used for The Temperance Seven Fan Club. With this somewhat complicated and very convoluted background explanation out of the way, tomorrow we will show you an expanded timeline that is both documented and accurate which begin to fsill in gaps within the timeline, and it will help to provide a factual account about the process in which 6 Chesterfield Gardens became the home of Radio Caroline communications on air, by mail and by phone. By the way, we appreciate any information regarding secretarial typographical errors which may appear in this ongoing part-work. It will also be re-edited later on for incorporation into a printed version. If you have participated in this regard, we thank you for your participatory assistance. Please also note that because we are self-funding this work we do not owe anyone at all any explanation regarding our timetable for publication. Our research is moving along in most serendipitous manner where new information is coming to light as a result of one answer to a question giving rise to yet another question. UPDATE - Monday, September 6, 2021: Over the course of this past weekend, we have been fortunate enough to make contact with someone who has been conducting their own research in a different but related undertaking. From their research and cooperation with this project, new information that begins to confirm details relating to the involvement of Jocelyn Stevens has also come to light. More about this in due course. |
Our team produced this free radio program for PCRL in Birmingham.
It was repeatedly broadcast on and after October 20, 1985. Click & listen! 
Blog Archive
August 2023
Copyright 2021 with all rights reserved.
|
