Oonagh Leigh and the timeline ....

On this Blog today, we were going to refer to the part played (quite by chance), by Oonagh Leigh, when she added her own element to an to authentic timeline of events that related to the use of 6 Chesterfield Gardens in London, by entities sheltering under the umbrella name of 'Radio Caroline'.

However, on our companion Blog today, we were forced to draw attention to the current plans of Paul Rusling - because right now he may be in the process of attempting another theft of our self-funded research. Therefore, we have decided to temporarily sit back and see what Rusling does next.

In the meantime, we will now work upon assembling an edited version of the content already published Online in our twin blogs, and then publish them in print in as many volumes as necessary. To this we will also add a biographical account drawn from the lives of our Trio, and we will relate those lives to the same material. But, we will do so with added personal details, because of the close first-person contact that our Trio had with many of those involved in this story.

Another reason for taking this step is to be found on this Blog dated August 4, 2020.

That is where we dealt with the story behind Paul Rusling's original theft, although we left out many details which we will now reinsert into the actual story. In that edition dated August 4, 2020, we explained how an Admin (Dave Martin) on the 'Free Radio Forum' posted on September 19, 2019, the following comment about Rusling's 'bible'. It reads: "It is endorsed by many, including Mervyn Hagger, Gary Stevens and Hans Knot." That was before Rusling actually began selling his book.

Paul Rusling then responded on October 30, 2019 by claiming that: ".... The Radio Caroline Bible is nothing to do with Mervyn Hagger." But that statement by Rusling contradicted his own advance sales flyer dated September 21, 2019.

The denial by Rusling was followed by this post: "I thought Paul there was a mention of Hagger within the acknowledgements - that has now vanished/censored??? Yes or No??"

That question was followed by this answer: "Posted by Dave Martin on 1/11/2019 .... Freddie look here https://mb.boardhost.com/FreeRadioForum/msg/1569052225.html" (A reference to 'Free Radio Forum' .)

In turn, Freddie Archer who is really Bob Meade replied: "Thanks Dave, I thought I did not dream it up. If Paul has erased ALL of Hagger's nonsense (including his name) from his book, he can come here and say so and welcome, silence is not an option though, nor is denial."

​We demanded that this acknowledgement (shown above), which served as a form of endorsement, be amended by removing any reference to Mervyn Hagger. Not only is Rusling's book based upon theft of intellectual research which was paid for by us, but his entire book is a twisted diatribe in support of a myth created and promoted by Ian Cowper Ross, as well as the undeserved adoration of Ronan O'Rahilly who was NOT the creator of 'Radio Caroline'!

Rusling complied with our demand and the reference disappeared.

​Rusling's twin excuse was that a) it was not an endorsement, and b) Hans Knot was to blame for creating this text as a means of promoting the sale of Rusling's book.

​Now Bob Meade aka Freddie Archer, is one the most self-righteous, opinionated, waste of space that has ever been given birth to on this Planet.

Why anyone should give a flying hoot about anything this guy says?

But he demands answers, and the world should answer to him, or else!

Paul Rusling and Bob Meade are typical of the people who call themselves 'anoraks'.

They claim to know everything and yet they know nothing. They do no work in research, but demand that others do it for them - to their specifications - or suffer for failure to do so.

What a jerk this guy is.

In short, Bob Meade is a classic example of why this world in the West has descended into the squawking noise-box of nothingness that it is now residing in.

But Bob Meade does not stop there!

He puts his self-righteous stupidity into print - albeit under the name of 'Freddie Archer', and this is what he also wrote on November 1, 2019: "I hope his (Mervyn's) book, if it ever sees the light of day, is a huge flop. To pick on someone who cannot defend themselves, is vileness of the first order. But Hagger, seems to have no normal human feelings at all. Just complete and utter selfishness."

Bob Meade was referring to our unmasking of the lies spun by Ronan O'Rahilly and his ilk. In Meade's mind the name Ronan O'Rahilly approaches that of a saint in a pseudo 'Church of Caroline'.

​Meade's thinking seems to be that if someone is unable to respond because they are incapacitated or even dead, then the adage "don't speak badly about them" seems to apply to Ronan O'Rahilly. Therefore to Bob Meade, denouncing Heinrich Himmler who set the gas ovens of WWII in overdrive, would be a crime in itself.

Okay, not Heinrich Himmler?

No?

How about his boss Adolph Hitler?

No?

How about Al Capone?

No?

How about Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew? (Rusling told us that he wanted someone with a nasty reputation like Epstein who had money to go into business with him on his 'Party Boat' venture. Rusling thought that his version of nastiness was just a misunderstood person.)

Not Epstein or Andrew?

Then how about a nameless young thug who beats up old ladies for their money?

No?

Well then, who?

Oh, that's right - anyone who tells the truth and stands up for what is right and denounces what is wrong with world of the anoraks, and never asks YOU for money.

How about when we denounce people like Ronan O'Rahilly and lessor beings like Paul Rusling?

Given that we are now dealing with such amoral people from the gutter, we will stop what we are doing and see what this gutter press of Rusling is about to do. (For details of his announced plans please visit our companion Blog.)

Meantime, we will now keep you informed about our own print schedule while taking a closer look at the possibility that more theft is about to be committed by Paul Rusling.

But in the meantime we will mitigate the additional harm that may come our way by halting this version of our operation on both blogs.

By the way: Our research is continuing, and now our pre-print editing work has begun.

As a result of this change in strategy, we will be adding a change to our contact links,

For general comments please continue to visit 'Conversation Central'.

But if you would like to be kept privately informed about our research and publishing timetable, there will be an additional link for you to add your details. This change will come into effect within the next 24 hours.

(Anoraks are not welcome.)