A Challenge to a person called Rod Watts ....

While we are still awaiting delivery of the book by Paul Rusling, which is preventing us from tipping our hand to our latest research, we want to take on the person calling himself 'Rod Watts', in relation to his own post on December 3, 2021, at 5:31 pm, and ask him this:

Today you wrote this: "I Reject your version of Reality, and Substitute my own." No matter where you first heard that statement, you repeated it because you agreed with it.

Therefore, leaving aside all of the nonsense, and accepting for the moment that this Blog represents the work of three people who have undertaken years of research, which they have paid for, what specifically do you disagree with when it comes to that research?

Clearly we do not agree with the words, however assembled, that were written by Paul Rusling in which he claims that Radio Caroline began in 1964, and continues today.

We have stated that Radio Caroline began regular broadcasting in March 1964, and that it died at midnight on August 14 1967, because the people who had funded Radio Caroline all bailed out, and after that date, the two Radio Caroline ships were taken over by an ad hoc group and run from Holland until March the following year. After that they were both towed away. The mv Caroline was never to broadcast again, and the mv Mi Amigo also remained silent until it was rescued from a scrap yard by some radio enthusiasts who had nothing to do with the people behind Radio Caroline 1964-1967.

Using the same name of Radio Caroline does not prove association. If someone else came along and called themselves Rod Watts, that person would not be you. It would be another person using the same name as you, but the two of you would be two different people.

So Rod, what part of that do you disagree with, and where in our extensive research that we have already published on our two Blogs and in both journalistic articles and academic papers, do you find errors?

Please be specific.

We are not interested in sham statements such as "I Reject your version of Reality, and Substitute my own." We claim that we are dealing in factual reality supported by documentation, while we do claim that Paul Rusling is doing exactly what your statement implies. He is dealing in gossip.

So show us up using our by citing own words to prove that we are in error.

Because this is an ongoing research project we continually correct our own errors, so please cite our latest statements as proof of your own statement.

It is easy for anoraks to throw around slogans, but Rusling has already told us that he does not undertake research of his own. He is engaging in gossip. We are engaging in demonstrable and provable facts.

Reality is an event that takes place at a specific time in space.

Any claim made to something else that does not occur in that same time and in that same space, and then claimed to be the same event that took place in that same time and space, is not reality.

It is a lie.

Over to you Rod.