December 22, 2021 and still no book ....

Still no book from Paul Rusling.

What is Rusling playing at?

No person that we have located Online seems to have received and then reviewed his so-called 'updated-bible' book.

When we announced plans to have Mike Wilson review the 'updated' Rusling book in depth - after we have received it and performed a quick glance-through - which will be prior to sending it on to Mike Wilson by Priority Mail - Rusling wrote that he would offer to give everyone who bought the first version of his 'bible' a free copy in pdf of his 'updated' manuscript. Overnight an Admin on the Garry Stevens Forum amended that post. Then, the next day Rusling wrote that he was 'clarifying' his offer. He was offering to give buyers of the original version a 'compendium' of changes in the 'updated' version.

But we do not trust anything that Rusling writes or says and here is why:

First he offered to become a financial contributor to our team and he visited our sub-library twice, as well as sending us numerous emails. Then he stabbed us in the back with his ridiculous 'bible' and got someone that he branded "Sir" to write that we had endorsed it!

What cheek.

So we complained and he removed that endorsement and claimed that it was not really an endorsement but a thank you for allowing him to steal our research and then twist it to fit the stupid O'Rahilly-Smith 'Caroline lives' narrative.

When that didn't work, Rusling claimed that what we had researched and uncovered was public knowledge - which it wasn't and still isn't - because we have continued our research uncovering information that Rusling did not, and still does not have access to.

Now the problem with Paul Alexander Rusling is that before releasing his original 'bible' he published several pages as 'samples' which differed from the text in his published 'bible'. So his first edition was  really the first complete edition and not the first edition.

Then he announced publication of his second or 'updated' edition for November 2, 2021, which we still don't have, even though we placed an order at the end of October in advance of the publication date. Now he is offering to send out free of charge a manuscript - but his offer has even changed in description within a 48 hour time window.

Rather than tip our hand and show Rusling what we now know, we decided to wait until we saw what Paul Rusling is claiming to be his updated manuscript in a book. That is why we bought his 'updated bible', and perhaps that is why we have not received it.

Something is being shipped to us, the bookseller says, but since Rusling's updated cover is exactly the same as his original cover - apart from a tiny yellow sticker in the bottom left-hand corner of the illustration of his own book, his manuscript could contain anything. In view of his constant changes he could be churning our weekly 'updates' for all we know and trying to stay one jump ahead.

Therefore, if we tell our readers what we now know - in detail - Rusling could steal that information and put it in a new manuscript and send it out to his readers and by so doing claim that he had already 'published' material that we claim is new! The legal definition of the word 'publishing' would allow him to do just that.

Rusling is an intellectual property thief and a plagiarist. He will stoop to any low level necessary to achieve his end, but we cannot be seen legally to have assisted him in his theft. The law requires that we mitigate our loss (as a result of his theft) by taking all steps necessary not to allow Rusling to continue stealing and get away with it. That is what the law requires us to do if we want to seek financial damages from him.

So at the moment we cannot publish anything  (other that what is on our blogs, or in academic articles or journalistic articles or in radio and TV program scripts, or in books! By constantly claiming that one person and not three people are behind this work, Rusling thinks that he is being clever by demanding to know where is that promised book by the person he has called 'Haggerly'? But no such promise has been made and that person as described does not exist.

There was even this anonymous (Rusling?) post on Mike Wilson's 'Conversation Now' at 08:34:44 am on December 18, 2021 and headed "Dial 999 for Caroline". It referred to a statement posted on November 24, 2020 at 11:55:36 am: "Over at yesternoir.org an announcement will be made very soon how you can get a copy of 'Dial 999 for Caroline' - almost free of charge for a limited time to a limited few." That was long before Rusling announced his 'updated' book and before we placed an advance order for it.

By the precise quoting of our comments it is obvious the Paul Rusling and his cronies are well aware of what we are publishing, and both he and they are quite capable of lifting our own research for Rusling's use - which they have done before.

Therefore, until we see a time and date stamped 'updated' manuscript by Paul Rusling, we are not able to move ahead for legal reasons of mitigation of damages. Once we receive something in the name of Paul Rusling that is time and date stamped, that puts a halt to his ability to steal and claim that he already knew something that our PAID research has uncovered, then, and only then, can we tell you what we now know for a fact!

When that will be is entirely in the hands of Paul Alexander Rusling.