For the very first time, the anorak community (and everyone else), have been able to see the ceremony that was engaged in during 1967, which extended the Marine Offences Act to include the Isle of Man.

On August 31, 1967, an Order in Council extended the original law which came into effect in the United Kingdom on August 14, 1967, to the Isle of Man. The mechanism by which this was achieved followed the same format that King Charles III has now engaged in to take office as Sovereign on behalf of the British Crown.

Charles only had to utter one word: "Approved". His utterance was in keeping with the methodology engaged in by his now deceased mother Queen Elizabeth II. That was back in 1967 when she made it a criminal offence for any British citizen to assist in broadcasts by 'Radio Caroline North'  which was operating from the motor vessel 'Caroline' anchored in Ramsay Bay.

The reason for pointing this out is that at the moment in time, is because anoraks seem to be glib little ostriches with their heads in the sand. They have a total disconnect between the manner in which the British Crown, which is a corporation sole, obtained ultimate control over the lives of everyone currently living in, and resident in, the British Isles, and thus killed off 'Radio Caroline North'.

The means by which that power was acquired, was via King Henry VIII of England. He based his own claim upon a fraudulent document said to have been made as a result of a bequest of the western half of the Roman Empire. That supposed 'gift' was made to a Pope in Rome.

​When King Henry VIII severed his connection with Rome, he became spiritual 'Pope' of his own Church of England, and instead of remaining a vassal of the Pope in Rome, he took the 'temporal' powers of the Pope and made himself the Head of government answering only to God.

Then a succession of events that included the execution of King Charles I in 1649, and the gradual transformation of the independent Kingdom of England and the independent Kingdom of Scotland over which Charles I had separately reigned, were transformed over time into a de facto united republic - after the head of Charles I was chopped off..

That series of events was followed by a coup d'état involving the executed king's son, and a military leader from Coldstream in Scotland. The united republic was then overthrown and a new monarchy was begun in 1660 by King Charles II to reign over two separate kingdoms of England and Scotland.

Then, under the king following Charles II, another coup d'état was accomplished by an invading army from Holland. All of this took place long before the two separate kingdoms of England and Scotland were united in 1707 as the Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. That was the Kingdom of Great Britain from which in 1776, the thirteen original North American colonies declared their independence.

About one hundred years after the creation of the Kingdom of Great Britain, the United Kingdom came into existence after it absorbed the Kingdom of Ireland. Then, later still once most of the island of Ireland became an independent republic, yet another entity was created that finally emerged at the beginning of the Twentieth Century.

All of this so-called 'history' is merely a compact legacy of lies based upon a yesterday that never happened. What is happening today with King Charles III is a farce reenacting that legacy of lies, deceit, theft and fraud, all of which deny basic individual human rights and rest upon a foundation of Black slavery.

There is a connection between the death of 'Radio Caroline North' and events that are now gathering pace with preparations for the coronation of King Charles III. That connection is also smothered in a legacy of lies, deceit, theft and fraud denying basic human rights. This awful timeline is the one that connects with King Charles II who "approved" the 'Act of Oblivion' that put into place a  governmental censorship agency called the General Post Office.

It is time for anoraks to admit the truth and stop their own lies, deceit, theft and fraud, while fawning over the very system of government that killed the broadcasting system that they claim to be resurrecting! Hypocrisy doesn't begin to explain their actions.

Unfortunately anorak claims continue to be made in the name of a Crown licensed pseudo-station called 'Radio Caroline', which in turn cooperates with a farce calling itself 'Radio Caroline North'. It operates in conjunction with the current owners of a Crown licensed broadcasting station on the Isle of Man. Their two-faced nonsense is promoted by anoraks who worship the Crown on one side of their masked faces, with the anarchistic and deceased Messiah named O'Rahilly on the other side.

It is a disgusting legacy that is currently being celebrated by King Charles III with grovelling support from anoraks.

Over the years there has been talk that Prince Charles might opt to become known as someone other than King Charles III. Charles, we now ask that you stick with this interim title after your coronation, so that we can explain with a lot more clarity what became of King Charles I and how King Charles II gained his bogus hold over the kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland.

Readers can find many of the details in our linked monograph [below] about the 'Interregnum'.

The facts on the ground show that a conjuring trick was played on the Peoples of the British Isles long before Rabbie Burns made his declaration about the people of Scotland: "We're bought and sold for English gold - Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!"

Now the cry for independence for Scotland has risen past the ranting of a few to the parliamentary cries of many at Holyrood. But the question is: "Independence from what?"

King Charles II of England, was never crowned as King Charles II of Scotland, and the creation of the Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was still a long way off in the future. But Charles II was proclaimed to be King of Scotland, because several years earlier he had been falsely crowned at Scone Palace as "King of Great Britain" - a nation that did not exist and would not exist for many years in the future.

But to stop the whispering and the questioning, King Charles II of England, who presumed to be King Charles II of Scotland, had signed-off on a law after 1660 when he gained power in London. That law was the 'Act of Oblivion'. Everyone under his thumb was forbidden to speak about the events that followed the death of his dad King Charles I in 1649 - when an axe chopped off his head.

Why?

Because through a series of civil wars and related events, England and Scotland briefly became a united nation, but not as a kingdom, but as a republic!

So what has this to do with 'Radio Caroline'?

Everything!

To enforce the 'Act of Oblivion' a General Post Office was created by the Crown under King Charles II, and the purpose of this GPO was to have exclusive control of private correspondence and thus, take on the ability to censor radical words that might undermine the illegitimate rule of King Charles II. The Crown in this context is not a hat, but a very secretive organization that is structured as a corporation sole, just like the Papacy in Rome from whence the idea originated under King Henry VIII of England.

King Charles II believed in "might make right".

"Might make right" became the law of communication control in the British Isles. First the mails, then the telegraph, then the wireless telegraph, then the telephone and then the wireless telephone which became known as 'telephony'. They were initially all point-to-point communications.

But wireless telephony meant that anyone other than the intended first party could 'listen-in'. This is the practice that became dubbed as 'broadcasting'.

Maybe it was possible to consider that all of the above forms of communications required connecting points, and therefore those connecting points were merely electronic post offices.

So we ask: how did 'broadcasting' that skipped the 'post office' intermediary step between 'sender' (transmitter) and receiver (listener) get around that issue?

Enter the Royal Navy and the Official Secrets Act. Now the military had the upper-hand and the upper-hand over that upper-hand was the hand of the Crown.

It is a short skip forward in time to 1964 and the advent of a ship anchored just outside British territorial waters upon which a broadcasting 'plant' (the name by which the location of a radio station was originally known), had been built. After several failed attempts, a station called 'Radio Caroline' made it on to the air, and then the shouting began.

Shouting, because except for a few 'quality' publications in the very early days that tried to deal with the legality of this issue, the mainstream press broke into sensational reporting that focused upon the Postmaster General of the day - as if he alone was the 'spoil-sport'. But he was not.

Moving on past 1967, we then enter the phase of criminal activity replacing what had been a true legal issue regarding freedom of speech and expression, to one of lies, deceit and theft by those engaging in offshore broadcasting.

Today, many years have past since August 14, 1967, and considerably more since 1660 and the days of King Charles II. But now, as of yesterday we have a King Charles III already holding the de facto reigns of control over the British Crown.

We use the word 'de facto' because not only has a coronation yet to take place, but by going back in time to King Charles II and his 'Act of Oblivion' which forbade everyone from discussing the fate of King Charles I and how England and Scotland briefly became a united republic, we can see that King Charles III is going to be sitting on a "Throne of Lies and Deceit". The alternative is for Charles to now tell the truth.

What a revolution that would set in motion!

All of sudden John Lilburne's name would be resurrected as the champion of individual liberty and a written constitution for England. If Lilburne had won and not been imprisoned by both Charles I and Oliver Cromwell, he might have set in motion a true revolution in the British Isles. Scotland would be free and so would the entire land mass of the island of Ireland.

It's your call Charlie.

What are you going to do?

While readers are waiting to find out, please avail yourself of our video that we made some time ago. This video does explain the 'Act of Oblivion' in context, as well as the lies and deceit of Ronan O'Rahilly. Then, read more about John Lilburne in our previously published monograph:

Back in 2015 we submitted a monograph which was accepted for publication in: Hypercultura (ISSN 2285-2115) with this title:

In view of current developments, it is time for Prince Charles to read it, if he has not already done so. You should read it too by clicking this button:

Following-up on a half-page feature in a 1966 edition of the Wolverhampton Express and Star, written by Mervyn Hagger in England, he wrote to Don Pierson in Texas and asked him many questions. He did not receive a reply.

So in 1971 Mervyn went to Texas to interview Don Pierson in person. That visit turned into half-a-lifetime during which Don Pierson turned over his legal and financial records regarding his foray into offshore broadcasting, and a whole lot more. In the boxes given to Mervyn was his original letter! The year was 1985 and by then Genie Baskir had joined a company that Don Pierson helped to create. When Eric Gilder joined Mervyn and Genie to form 'The Trio', he did so after writing his own published thesis about Don Pierson.

​In the '80s a number of misleading interviews were given to the press and private publications by people such as dj Johnnie Walker (birth name Peter Waters Dingley), who was originally employed by Don Pierson. Thinking that no one would ever contradict and correct him, Johnnie Walker decided to invent a number of really silly and insulting stories about Don Pierson.

However, Mervyn Hagger played Walker's remarks for Don Pierson to hear and comment upon. That request resulted in the only full-length audio interview with Don Pierson about his creation of 'Radio London', 'Radio England' and 'Britain Radio'. The audio excerpt playing at the top of this web site is taken from that same full-length audio interview.

Since then, other people employed by Don Pierson have tried to 'cash in' on their own self-importance by making their own silly remarks which have been put on line. One such person is Ben Toney, now deceased. Toney decided to fabricate a lot of false information about Mervyn Hagger, but because Mervyn Hagger became part of 'The Trio' investigating this entire story, the hard evidence proving that Ben Toney decided to lie at the expense of Mervyn Hagger, has been retained, and from time-to-time it has been published.

However, what began as a limited focused story about offshore 'pirate' radio, has turned into a full-fledged major investigation into the origins of both British and American broadcasting. This investigation, which has been entirely funded by 'The Trio', is now drawing to a close, and it will soon result in a trilogy of books from which it is hoped that a TV mini-series and even a full-length motion picture will emerge. It is a unique, and copyrighted exclusive work which has never, ever, been told in context and in its entirety by anyone else, anywhere, at anytime to this date.

Everything we have researched to date can be documented as factual information. Nothing will be 'spun' as an invented tale when the anticipated trilogy of books is released. It is expected that when commercial scriptwriters prepare a TV documentary series drawn from the texts of those books, and especially when a motion picture script is generated by others, that they will follow the traditional 'based upon' formula. At that point in time we can only hope that they will stick to the true story as much as entertainment factors will allow.

The only way to learn about the past is to follow all of the ripples to observe how they interact with each other. Those ripples are caused by individual human lives, and one of them reflects a life that was a major influence in the creation of British commercial broadcasting. But most people have never heard of this person.

It is not a biography that has been told anywhere else in recent times. We had to undertake a major research project that has taken decades to complete.

Our investigation is now drawing to a close and it is about to enter into a precursory editing phase. That is when we look at all of the evidence collected so far, as we assemble it into a basic storyline that anyone who wants to learn about a person and events that the Establishments on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean have ignored, and there is good reason to believe that their obfuscation has been intentional.

It is a story now backed by proof of validity, and not a story based upon hearsay, rumours or wild and unfounded conspiracy theories. It is a thrilling story: as good as it gets in the world of clandestine geopolitical international intrigue, and it is a story that is especially valid for today.

We now have most of the evidence necessary to begin to share it with others, but meanwhile our investigation still continues while we find additional documentation for this story that has never told in its entirety by anyone, at anytime, anywhere during the past one hundred years. 

Current ongoing research has resulted in a lot more basic information which has revealed a connectivity that we did not understand prior to now. (See date of this notice.) Therefore, during the course of the next few months we will begin to shift our focus to reflect our new understanding.

At present our service remains free of charge to everyone, but it will begin to split between our academic monographs and a commercial approach that will help to underwrite the costs involved with our investigative work. Because we are satisfied that we now understand the true story and reason for the myths perpetrated about 'Radio Caroline' of 1964-1967, which is totally unrelated to any venture that has adopted use of that name since then, we will henceforth begin to focus upon other aspects of this story that relate to the birth of broadcasting which we are still in the process of documenting.

Our companion Blog will no longer be updated with additional information relating to the offshore period, but that information will eventually be released within the wider context of our published research.

We are now working on our 5th part-work publication, which will be published at the same location as the previous monologues. In the last few weeks we have made even more connecting discoveries and all of them will be included in our new book. Because our intention is not to create material that can be plagiarized prior to publication, no further details about our recent breakthroughs will be added here.

Now that more information has come to light, we have recently updated a previous entry on this page about the life of Ian Cowper Ross and his father Charles Edward Ross. Click the link for more details.

This revision now concludes the Precursory Chapter Index to Volume One in this series.

​The Precursory Chapters listed in this Index here may differ from the final versions in print. This precursory Index will be continually expanded, as more precursory Chapters are added.

This is both a work that is still in the research and precursory editorial process. As we dug deeper and deeper into the story of James Dudley Wilmeth, and his reason for being sent to Moscow in 1944, it became obvious that not only does that phase of his life begin a new chapter, for us it also marked the start of new volume. Therefore we will now conclude this volume with Precursory Chapter Thirty-five, and the precursory chapter that was to have become Precursory Chapter Thirty-six in this first volume and titled "Our Man in Moscow", will now become the first chapter of the second volume in the series.

A link to the Second Volume will appear here